'the OTHER side' believes.
GA Tiger: One of your fallacies is that to sum up the proof to your argument, you tell the OTHER side what they think and what they would do. And don't understand why it fails as proof.
Please explain what you believe and we can discuss that then.
GA Tiger: I don't understand. Not even close. And that.s after 20 years of going to church.
What part do you not understand specifically? Do you not understand Christian teaching?
Or do you not understand why if one accepts the theory that "there is no God", then humans are just one of millions of species of animals with nothing "special" about them that would necessarily impart some dignity to them by nature of the fact that they happen to be humans?
Or that if one accepts the theory that "there is no God", then there really is no ultimate meaning to life, that we all just exist temporarily as natural processes & will be wiped out as though we never existed and what we do now or in the future is essentially meaningless in the grand scheme of things?
Here is a brief synopsis of the case for the truth of the Christian claims (in case you are interested):
http://tigerboard.com/boards/view.php?message=15109638