Welcome Guest

Ideology is important say the libs re SCOTUS. They

Posted on: October 22, 2019 at 13:52:57 CT
hokie VT
Posts:
68174
Member For:
9.66 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
10
were delighted that a "wise latina" was confirmed to the court because she brings a different set of experiences to the court. Maybe the most absurd statement regarding the SCOTUS i've ever heard.

And if the nation was divided, shouldn't the court have been as well? Should we not count or discount, the votes of justices in 1850 if they did not see civil rights the way we see them in 2019?

There is no political or judicial position where diversity of thought, ideology, or demographics is LESS IMPORTANT than on the supreme court.

Why and how would a wise latina interpret a constitutional question from 1850 differently from an old fat white guy?

What value do life experiences have for sitting in judgement of legal writings? I say virtually none at all.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     Here's something people don't know. In 1781 - GA Tiger MU - 10/22 14:48:45
     SCOTUS for the first 70 years was controlled - MrBlueSky MU - 10/22 13:17:27
          So you're arguing fairness and racism instead of the - hokie VT - 10/22 13:28:49
               No, I'm arguing the facts on the ground - MrBlueSky MU - 10/22 13:29:54
                    Voted in elections, really? So your argument is that - hokie VT - 10/22 13:33:43
                         My argument would be that if anyone was guilty of activism - Mormad MU - 10/22 13:38:29
                              I agree that his writings on the missouri compromise were - hokie VT - 10/22 13:42:52
                                   Probably so - Mormad MU - 10/22 13:49:40
                                        Excellent point re moving to a free state, if that had been - hokie VT - 10/22 13:59:16
                                             That was Scott's argument.. - MrBlueSky MU - 10/22 14:56:30
                                             That was essentially Scott's argument - Mormad MU - 10/22 14:02:42
                              Correct, but Taney took it a step further and he was trying - MrBlueSky MU - 10/22 13:42:19
                                   Which has nothing to do with the merits of the case. nm - hokie VT - 10/22 13:43:43
                                        He made it part of the case, so of course it does - MrBlueSky MU - 10/22 13:45:27
                                             As I said, Taney was being the "activist" - Mormad MU - 10/22 13:52:38
                         Lol, he was a bigot. Roger Taney tried to say that - MrBlueSky MU - 10/22 13:36:39
                              Never said he wasn't a bigot. I only said that that is all - hokie VT - 10/22 13:40:48
                                   You've ignored every thing else I said. (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 10/22 13:41:17
                                        The make-up of the court was pro-slave State - Mormad MU - 10/22 13:43:52
                                             Ideology is important say the libs re SCOTUS. They - hokie VT - 10/22 13:52:57
                                                  That's because you're misinterpreting what I said - Mormad MU - 10/22 13:58:01
                                                       Apologies. I did not mean to suggest that you advocated - hokie VT - 10/22 14:04:47
                                                            I would think, sitting on the court would be difficult - Mormad MU - 10/22 14:07:45
                                                                 I'm starting to wonder if it has always been thus. The - hokie VT - 10/22 14:16:48
                                                                      I think it depends on whether your ox is being gored - Mormad MU - 10/22 14:23:18
     Excerpt from tanney. - hokie VT - 10/22 12:58:16
          is this a topic from last nights KKK meeting? - ashtray UF - 10/22 13:01:03
               lol (nm) - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/22 13:07:07
               If incapable of reasoned debate, please shut up. nm - hokie VT - 10/22 13:02:07
                    if you held yourself to that standard - pickle MU - 10/22 13:07:16
                    oh, it's not me I'm worried about - ashtray UF - 10/22 13:03:35
                    Yet you vomited the OP...... - mizzoumurfkc KC - 10/22 13:03:21
                         Can you address the issue, or merely signal your - hokie VT - 10/22 13:08:55




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard