Welcome Guest

Excerpt from tanney.

Posted on: October 22, 2019 at 12:58:16 CT
hokie VT
Posts:
68174
Member For:
9.66 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
10
There are two clauses in the Constitution which point directly and specifically to the negro race as a separate class of persons, and show clearly that they were not regarded as a portion of the people or citizens of the Government then formed.

One of these clauses reserves to each of the thirteen States the right to import slaves until the year 1808, if it thinks proper. And the importation which it thus sanctions was unquestionably of persons of the race of which we are speaking, as the traffic in slaves in the United States had always been confined to them. And by the other provision the States pledge themselves to each other to maintain the right of property of the master, by delivering up to him any slave who may have escaped from his service, and be found within their respective territories. By the first above-mentioned clause, therefore, the right to purchase and hold this property is directly sanctioned and authorized for twenty years by the people who framed the Constitution. And by the second, they pledge themselves to maintain and uphold the right of the master in the manner specified, as long as the Government they then formed should endure. And these two provisions show, conclusively, that neither the description of persons therein referred to, nor their descendants, were embraced in any of the other provisions of the Constitution; for certainly these two clauses were not intended to confer on them or their posterity the blessings of liberty, or any of the personal rights so carefully provided for the citizen.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     Here's something people don't know. In 1781 - GA Tiger MU - 10/22 14:48:45
     SCOTUS for the first 70 years was controlled - MrBlueSky MU - 10/22 13:17:27
          So you're arguing fairness and racism instead of the - hokie VT - 10/22 13:28:49
               No, I'm arguing the facts on the ground - MrBlueSky MU - 10/22 13:29:54
                    Voted in elections, really? So your argument is that - hokie VT - 10/22 13:33:43
                         My argument would be that if anyone was guilty of activism - Mormad MU - 10/22 13:38:29
                              I agree that his writings on the missouri compromise were - hokie VT - 10/22 13:42:52
                                   Probably so - Mormad MU - 10/22 13:49:40
                                        Excellent point re moving to a free state, if that had been - hokie VT - 10/22 13:59:16
                                             That was Scott's argument.. - MrBlueSky MU - 10/22 14:56:30
                                             That was essentially Scott's argument - Mormad MU - 10/22 14:02:42
                              Correct, but Taney took it a step further and he was trying - MrBlueSky MU - 10/22 13:42:19
                                   Which has nothing to do with the merits of the case. nm - hokie VT - 10/22 13:43:43
                                        He made it part of the case, so of course it does - MrBlueSky MU - 10/22 13:45:27
                                             As I said, Taney was being the "activist" - Mormad MU - 10/22 13:52:38
                         Lol, he was a bigot. Roger Taney tried to say that - MrBlueSky MU - 10/22 13:36:39
                              Never said he wasn't a bigot. I only said that that is all - hokie VT - 10/22 13:40:48
                                   You've ignored every thing else I said. (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 10/22 13:41:17
                                        The make-up of the court was pro-slave State - Mormad MU - 10/22 13:43:52
                                             Ideology is important say the libs re SCOTUS. They - hokie VT - 10/22 13:52:57
                                                  That's because you're misinterpreting what I said - Mormad MU - 10/22 13:58:01
                                                       Apologies. I did not mean to suggest that you advocated - hokie VT - 10/22 14:04:47
                                                            I would think, sitting on the court would be difficult - Mormad MU - 10/22 14:07:45
                                                                 I'm starting to wonder if it has always been thus. The - hokie VT - 10/22 14:16:48
                                                                      I think it depends on whether your ox is being gored - Mormad MU - 10/22 14:23:18
     Excerpt from tanney. - hokie VT - 10/22 12:58:16
          is this a topic from last nights KKK meeting? - ashtray UF - 10/22 13:01:03
               lol (nm) - TigerJackSwartz MU - 10/22 13:07:07
               If incapable of reasoned debate, please shut up. nm - hokie VT - 10/22 13:02:07
                    if you held yourself to that standard - pickle MU - 10/22 13:07:16
                    oh, it's not me I'm worried about - ashtray UF - 10/22 13:03:35
                    Yet you vomited the OP...... - mizzoumurfkc KC - 10/22 13:03:21
                         Can you address the issue, or merely signal your - hokie VT - 10/22 13:08:55




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard