RE: You don't evaluate a class by one player
Posted on: August 20, 2016 at 10:10:07 CT
CPA MU
Posts:
10055
Member For:
26.28 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
One player? Where'd you get THAT? So why'd you put Booker there in the first place? Or then switch out Simpson after my response? You're trying to prop up the regime, as you always do.
So my numbers re wrong? Let's look at yours . . . You named six, then three, then Howard and Simpson. That's 11 out of a class of 25. That averages a two depth, barely, over a four year period. Teams field 85, right? And my numbers are wrong?
And we haven't even covered the busts in the three star class.
Sorry, but this started in response to a "Well if Spoon was wrong, then the "experts" don't know what they're talking about" which is the common excuse for MU's recruiting.
"And I don't think we ever signed that many two-stars again". Well, good Lord, let's hope not after that experience.
To repeat: if one is going to name the two stars or under the radars that worked out, then let's be sure to consider the ones that didn't.
Turnabout is fair play, Jim.