'anti-choice' is another perverted Newspeak term from hell.
Posted on: April 26, 2025 at 18:29:52 CT
JeffB
MU
Posts:
72164
Member For:
21.41 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
You gloss over what the choice is, of course.
Right to lifers are against those who want to intentionally kill innocent unborn human beings.
You promote "the right" to intentionally kill innocent unborn human beings.
Do you have any limits on such a "right" (sic)?
eg. Do you support the "right" to kill innocent unborn children all the way up to (or after) birth? If not, where would you draw the line?
Do you support a mother's "right" to kill her unborn child if he or she is disabled? If not, where do you draw the line? How disable does her child need to be for her to have the right to kill her or him?
Do you support her "right" to kill her child for any or no reason, or are there *any* limits you impose in that regard?