 |
|
Of course. How is he or she NOT subject to the jurisdiction
Posted on: January 22, 2025 at 11:36:43 CT
hokie VT
Posts:
67155
Member For:
9.45 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Of the united states?
And if not, why? Is there an age limit where you BECOME subject to the jurisdiction of the US?
Are babies born to citizens in a hospital not subject to the jurisdiction?
The law is stupid.
It was so poorly written as to not be understandable.
But we on the right rail against activist judges who want to legislate from the bench.
If this part of the constitution is overturned by the stoke of a president's pen and upheld by the supreme court, then we are no better than the left wing radicals who want judges to legislate from the bench.
This will require imo, a constitutional amendment.
I'm not sure how big a deal this is anyway. If we just allow pedro to be a citizen of the US but his mother and father and four sisters and three brothers and uncles and aunts and two grandmothers and two grandfathers and sixteen cousins have to go back to mexico.
We can take care of one abandoned infant more easily and cheaply than we can an entire clan of uneducated, unskilled non english speaking mexicans.
Or you can take little pedro with you. to keep your family together.
This willingness to allow chain migration because one kid was born in the mud three feet inside american territory is crap. He or she is a citizen, per the constitution in my opinion.
Everyone else, out.
And if not, why? Is there an age limit where you BECOME subject to the jurisdiction of the US?
Are babies born to citizens in a hospital not subject to the jurisdiction?
The law is stupid.
It was so poorly written as to not be understandable.
But we on the right rail against activist judges who want to legislate from the bench.
If this part of the constitution is overturned by the stoke of a president's pen and upheld by the supreme court, then we are no better than the left wing radicals who want judges to legislate from the bench.
This will require imo, a constitutional amendment.
I'm not sure how big a deal this is anyway. If we just allow pedro to be a citizen of the US but his mother and father and four sisters and three brothers and uncles and aunts and two grandmothers and two grandfathers and sixteen cousins have to go back to mexico.
We can take care of one abandoned infant more easily and cheaply than we can an entire clan of uneducated, unskilled non english speaking mexicans.
Or you can take little pedro with you. to keep your family together.
This willingness to allow chain migration because one kid was born in the mud three feet inside american territory is crap. He or she is a citizen, per the constitution in my opinion.
Everyone else, out.
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
Of course. How is he or she NOT subject to the jurisdiction - hokie VT - 1/22 11:36:43
-