Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

I'll repeat it slowly for you then.

Posted on: July 9, 2019 at 10:28:44 CT
tigerdb MU
Posts:
58182
Member For:
24.23 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
The article states that the IG found Steele's information to be "sufficiently credible" to continue its (the IG's) investigation.

My question to you: If the IG found Steele's information to be "sufficiently credible" (or to have any level of credibility) - why would the FBI have not found some level of credibility (in 2016) - to pursue further investigation of Steele's information (as the IG is now "investigating further")?
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

The IG found that Steele's information was enough to - StaleyTiger MU - 7/9 08:22:28
     how very embarrassing for you(nm) - dangertim MU - 7/9 09:58:04
          lol (nm) - Sal KC - 7/9 10:18:54
     the ig is gonna find and authenticate the peepee tape - gmmm98 MU - 7/9 09:17:48
     RE: The IG found that Steele's information was enough to - scan MU - 7/9 08:42:36
          The obvious issue is that if the IG's investigator's found - tigerdb MU - 7/9 08:50:01
               RE: The obvious issue is that if the IG's investigator's found - scan MU - 7/9 21:12:36
               RE: The obvious issue is that if the IG's investigator's found - scan MU - 7/9 10:05:39
                    I think that you have poor reading comprehension. - tigerdb MU - 7/9 10:10:50
                         RE: I think that you have poor reading comprehension. - scan MU - 7/9 10:23:23
                              I'll repeat it slowly for you then. - tigerdb MU - 7/9 10:28:44
                                   steele: "like I told the UK, my information was unverified" - dangertim MU - 7/9 10:32:55
                                        Some of the 17 points have been confirmed, others are - tigerdb MU - 7/9 10:44:53
                                             you are an idiot - Sal KC - 7/9 11:54:37
                                                  furthermore, dipsh it ...if Horowitz's investigators have - tigerdb MU - 7/9 12:16:03
                                                       What if Steele just confirmed his statements - Sal KC - 7/9 12:31:16
                                   RE: I'll repeat it slowly for you then. - scan MU - 7/9 10:30:27
                         if the info was "sufficiently credible" for the FBI, why wou - dangertim MU - 7/9 10:20:24
                              As per the article, Steele's information was "sufficiently - tigerdb MU - 7/9 10:24:51
                                   RE: As per the article, Steele's information was "sufficiently - scan MU - 7/9 10:29:01
                              lol (nm) - Sal KC - 7/9 10:21:47
                         Do you think Steele is feeding Horowitz - Sal KC - 7/9 10:18:36
               RE: The obvious issue is that if the IG's investigator's found - None**** MU - 7/9 09:17:18
                    Who have been the sources for previous stories that the - tigerdb MU - 7/9 09:19:15
                         Those were coming from Congress - Sal KC - 7/9 09:20:48
               It's simply referring to the information he provided the IG - Sal KC - 7/9 08:51:29
                    It's been known for over a month that Steele was willing - tigerdb MU - 7/9 09:10:38
                         He provided unverified information to the FBI - Sal KC - 7/9 09:13:20
                              He provided INFORMATION to the FBI - tigerdb MU - 7/9 09:16:58
                                   unverified information (nm) - Sal KC - 7/9 09:18:09
                                        sufficiently credible(nm) - tigerdb MU - 7/9 09:39:32
                                             There is nothing in the article - Sal KC - 7/9 10:16:05
                                                  "sufficiently credible". - tigerdb MU - 7/9 10:49:26
                                                       RE: "sufficiently credible". - scan MU - 7/9 10:51:33
     Not exactly what it said...but not good news for the trump - tigerdb MU - 7/9 08:36:23
          How is that bad news for Trump? - Sal KC - 7/9 08:49:54
               How is it bad news for the FBI? - tigerdb MU - 7/9 08:54:37
                    It's been delayed b/c Steele made himself - Sal KC - 7/9 09:03:20
                         Last second? LOL - tigerdb MU - 7/9 09:15:31
                              Yes, last second, the report was wrapping up - Sal KC - 7/9 09:17:45
                                   Bull ****...you have no idea how near completion the report - tigerdb MU - 7/9 09:27:44
                                        Steele has already discredited himself in UK courts - Sal KC - 7/9 09:30:48
                                             If what you say is true, then it really is surprising that - tigerdb MU - 7/9 09:39:14
                                                  lol you have no idea what Steele told Horowitz (nm) - Sal KC - 7/9 10:15:49
                                                       lol, and you do? - tigerdb MU - 7/9 10:32:54
     reading comprehension is absolutely lacking with libs here - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 7/9 08:31:21
          You answered your own question - tman MU - 7/9 09:04:07
     Can you read and understand English ? - mu7176grad MU - 7/9 08:30:33
     You need to re-read that - Sal KC - 7/9 08:25:57




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard