Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

I think that you have poor reading comprehension.

Posted on: July 9, 2019 at 10:10:50 CT
tigerdb MU
Posts:
58182
Member For:
24.23 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
"The obvious issue is that if the IG's investigator's found Steele's information to be "sufficiently credible" to extend their investigation...it's likely that the FBI would have had a basis for finding Steele's information "sufficiently credible" to investigate the information.

If the IG didn't discount Steele's information, how could the FBI not have taken it seriously?"


Clearly this article refers to the IG extending their investigation based on finding Steele's information to be "sufficiently credible". My point is that if the IG found it to be "sufficiently credible" - why wouldn't the FBI also have found Steele's information to be "sufficiently credible" (to investigate further - as the IG is doing - per the article.)
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

The IG found that Steele's information was enough to - StaleyTiger MU - 7/9 08:22:28
     how very embarrassing for you(nm) - dangertim MU - 7/9 09:58:04
          lol (nm) - Sal KC - 7/9 10:18:54
     the ig is gonna find and authenticate the peepee tape - gmmm98 MU - 7/9 09:17:48
     RE: The IG found that Steele's information was enough to - scan MU - 7/9 08:42:36
          The obvious issue is that if the IG's investigator's found - tigerdb MU - 7/9 08:50:01
               RE: The obvious issue is that if the IG's investigator's found - scan MU - 7/9 21:12:36
               RE: The obvious issue is that if the IG's investigator's found - scan MU - 7/9 10:05:39
                    I think that you have poor reading comprehension. - tigerdb MU - 7/9 10:10:50
                         RE: I think that you have poor reading comprehension. - scan MU - 7/9 10:23:23
                              I'll repeat it slowly for you then. - tigerdb MU - 7/9 10:28:44
                                   steele: "like I told the UK, my information was unverified" - dangertim MU - 7/9 10:32:55
                                        Some of the 17 points have been confirmed, others are - tigerdb MU - 7/9 10:44:53
                                             you are an idiot - Sal KC - 7/9 11:54:37
                                                  furthermore, dipsh it ...if Horowitz's investigators have - tigerdb MU - 7/9 12:16:03
                                                       What if Steele just confirmed his statements - Sal KC - 7/9 12:31:16
                                   RE: I'll repeat it slowly for you then. - scan MU - 7/9 10:30:27
                         if the info was "sufficiently credible" for the FBI, why wou - dangertim MU - 7/9 10:20:24
                              As per the article, Steele's information was "sufficiently - tigerdb MU - 7/9 10:24:51
                                   RE: As per the article, Steele's information was "sufficiently - scan MU - 7/9 10:29:01
                              lol (nm) - Sal KC - 7/9 10:21:47
                         Do you think Steele is feeding Horowitz - Sal KC - 7/9 10:18:36
               RE: The obvious issue is that if the IG's investigator's found - None**** MU - 7/9 09:17:18
                    Who have been the sources for previous stories that the - tigerdb MU - 7/9 09:19:15
                         Those were coming from Congress - Sal KC - 7/9 09:20:48
               It's simply referring to the information he provided the IG - Sal KC - 7/9 08:51:29
                    It's been known for over a month that Steele was willing - tigerdb MU - 7/9 09:10:38
                         He provided unverified information to the FBI - Sal KC - 7/9 09:13:20
                              He provided INFORMATION to the FBI - tigerdb MU - 7/9 09:16:58
                                   unverified information (nm) - Sal KC - 7/9 09:18:09
                                        sufficiently credible(nm) - tigerdb MU - 7/9 09:39:32
                                             There is nothing in the article - Sal KC - 7/9 10:16:05
                                                  "sufficiently credible". - tigerdb MU - 7/9 10:49:26
                                                       RE: "sufficiently credible". - scan MU - 7/9 10:51:33
     Not exactly what it said...but not good news for the trump - tigerdb MU - 7/9 08:36:23
          How is that bad news for Trump? - Sal KC - 7/9 08:49:54
               How is it bad news for the FBI? - tigerdb MU - 7/9 08:54:37
                    It's been delayed b/c Steele made himself - Sal KC - 7/9 09:03:20
                         Last second? LOL - tigerdb MU - 7/9 09:15:31
                              Yes, last second, the report was wrapping up - Sal KC - 7/9 09:17:45
                                   Bull ****...you have no idea how near completion the report - tigerdb MU - 7/9 09:27:44
                                        Steele has already discredited himself in UK courts - Sal KC - 7/9 09:30:48
                                             If what you say is true, then it really is surprising that - tigerdb MU - 7/9 09:39:14
                                                  lol you have no idea what Steele told Horowitz (nm) - Sal KC - 7/9 10:15:49
                                                       lol, and you do? - tigerdb MU - 7/9 10:32:54
     reading comprehension is absolutely lacking with libs here - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 7/9 08:31:21
          You answered your own question - tman MU - 7/9 09:04:07
     Can you read and understand English ? - mu7176grad MU - 7/9 08:30:33
     You need to re-read that - Sal KC - 7/9 08:25:57




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard