Welcome Guest

You need to re-read that

Posted on: July 9, 2019 at 08:25:57 CT

Sal CMSU

Posts:

229171

Member For:

21.85 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

That line is referring to the continuance of the IG's investigation b/c Steele agreed to a interview. Hence the delay in the release of the report. It isn't referring to the FBI's investigation into Trump.

Edited by Sal at 08:26:17 on 07/09/19

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

The IG found that Steele's information was enough to - StaleyTiger MU - 7/9 08:22:28

how very embarrassing for you(nm) - dangertim MU

- 7/9 09:58:04

lol (nm) - Sal KC - 7/9 10:18:54

the ig is gonna find and authenticate the peepee tape - gmmm98 MU

- 7/9 09:17:48

RE: The IG found that Steele's information was enough to - scan MU - 7/9 08:42:36

The obvious issue is that if the IG's investigator's found - tigerdb MU - 7/9 08:50:01

RE: The obvious issue is that if the IG's investigator's found - scan MU - 7/9 21:12:36

RE: The obvious issue is that if the IG's investigator's found - scan MU - 7/9 10:05:39

I think that you have poor reading comprehension. - tigerdb MU - 7/9 10:10:50

RE: I think that you have poor reading comprehension. - scan MU - 7/9 10:23:23

I'll repeat it slowly for you then. - tigerdb MU - 7/9 10:28:44

steele: "like I told the UK, my information was unverified" - dangertim MU

- 7/9 10:32:55

Some of the 17 points have been confirmed, others are - tigerdb MU - 7/9 10:44:53

you are an idiot - Sal KC - 7/9 11:54:37

furthermore, dipsh it ...if Horowitz's investigators have - tigerdb MU - 7/9 12:16:03

What if Steele just confirmed his statements - Sal KC - 7/9 12:31:16

RE: I'll repeat it slowly for you then. - scan MU - 7/9 10:30:27

if the info was "sufficiently credible" for the FBI, why wou - dangertim MU

- 7/9 10:20:24

As per the article, Steele's information was "sufficiently - tigerdb MU - 7/9 10:24:51

RE: As per the article, Steele's information was "sufficiently - scan MU - 7/9 10:29:01

lol (nm) - Sal KC - 7/9 10:21:47

Do you think Steele is feeding Horowitz - Sal KC - 7/9 10:18:36

RE: The obvious issue is that if the IG's investigator's found - None**** MU - 7/9 09:17:18

Who have been the sources for previous stories that the - tigerdb MU - 7/9 09:19:15

Those were coming from Congress - Sal KC - 7/9 09:20:48

It's simply referring to the information he provided the IG - Sal KC - 7/9 08:51:29

It's been known for over a month that Steele was willing - tigerdb MU - 7/9 09:10:38

He provided unverified information to the FBI - Sal KC - 7/9 09:13:20

He provided INFORMATION to the FBI - tigerdb MU - 7/9 09:16:58

unverified information (nm) - Sal KC - 7/9 09:18:09

sufficiently credible(nm) - tigerdb MU - 7/9 09:39:32

There is nothing in the article - Sal KC - 7/9 10:16:05

"sufficiently credible". - tigerdb MU - 7/9 10:49:26

RE: "sufficiently credible". - scan MU - 7/9 10:51:33

Not exactly what it said...but not good news for the trump - tigerdb MU - 7/9 08:36:23

How is that bad news for Trump? - Sal KC - 7/9 08:49:54

How is it bad news for the FBI? - tigerdb MU - 7/9 08:54:37

It's been delayed b/c Steele made himself - Sal KC - 7/9 09:03:20

Last second? LOL - tigerdb MU - 7/9 09:15:31

Yes, last second, the report was wrapping up - Sal KC - 7/9 09:17:45

Bull ****...you have no idea how near completion the report - tigerdb MU - 7/9 09:27:44

Steele has already discredited himself in UK courts - Sal KC - 7/9 09:30:48

If what you say is true, then it really is surprising that - tigerdb MU - 7/9 09:39:14

lol you have no idea what Steele told Horowitz (nm) - Sal KC - 7/9 10:15:49

lol, and you do? - tigerdb MU - 7/9 10:32:54

reading comprehension is absolutely lacking with libs here - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 7/9 08:31:21

You answered your own question - tman MU - 7/9 09:04:07

Can you read and understand English ? - mu7176grad MU - 7/9 08:30:33

You need to re-read that - Sal KC - 7/9 08:25:57