 |
|
I had not seen it before seeing your link below. I think it
Posted on: December 5, 2017 at 14:51:24 CT
JeffB MU
Posts:
73726
Member For:
21.78 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
is fatally flawed in at least a few respects on its own, and perhaps again if attempting to apply it to the discussion of this thread.
In your own words, could you sum up the basics of his post with regards to how you would apply it in this discussion. For instance, would it be something like:
If you would save the one 5 year old child rather than the 1,000 frozen embryos, that shows that even you don't believe that the frozen embryos are human beings... therefore,
embryos are not human beings,
therefore abortion is not deliberately killing human beings.
Or how would you phrase it?
In your own words, could you sum up the basics of his post with regards to how you would apply it in this discussion. For instance, would it be something like:
If you would save the one 5 year old child rather than the 1,000 frozen embryos, that shows that even you don't believe that the frozen embryos are human beings... therefore,
embryos are not human beings,
therefore abortion is not deliberately killing human beings.
Or how would you phrase it?
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
I had not seen it before seeing your link below. I think it - JeffB MU - 12/5 14:51:24