Welcome Guest

I would very much oppose #2

Posted on: November 14, 2016 at 09:23:59 CT

meatiger MU

Posts:

131848

Member For:

26.26 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

workforce should be determined by need..not just an arbitrary increase or reduction.

Should we reduce the federal government..sure..but that should be done by reducing departments, projects, ect.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Term Limits and reduction of workforce in fed govt - 90Tiger MU - 11/14 08:09:05

I would very much oppose #2 - meatiger MU - 11/14 09:23:59

#2 doesn't say anything about an arbitrary reduction. He - 90Tiger MU - 11/14 10:06:50

attrition doesn't require the job to be no longer needed (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 11/14 10:35:11

It's not something I'm against - DC Jayhawk KU - 11/14 09:00:50

You think contractors won't be impacted? My guess is - 90Tiger MU - 11/14 09:23:39

I'm interpreting it narrowly -- - DC Jayhawk KU - 11/14 09:41:14

My first thought would be members of congress - MrBlueSky MU - 11/14 08:45:43

Why via attrition? 10 percent cut immediately - tman KC - 11/14 08:12:28

businesses rarely do across the board cuts - meatiger MU - 11/14 09:24:58

I see both, but first is much better(nm) - tman KC - 11/14 09:33:21

it's humane, for one. I'm no fan of the indiscriminate no-n - 90Tiger MU - 11/14 08:18:09

No, but your revenue and expenses must match - tman KC - 11/14 08:25:45

the leaders fvck their budgets up all the time and then have - 90Tiger MU - 11/14 08:40:31

That is fine. Absent development programs - tman KC - 11/14 08:54:12

"in the business world"? - tigerdb MU - 11/14 08:33:43

I bet you have no clue - tman KC - 11/14 08:57:07

pssst - Democrats don't cut defense budget (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 11/14 08:38:48

Only monumental idiots.(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 11/14 08:10:17