Welcome Guest

It's astonishing how you're contorting to justify obvious

Posted on: July 23, 2018 at 11:45:56 CT
90Tiger STL
Posts:
163426
Member For:
23.37 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
dishonesty not only to the FISC court but the bigger picture - which was using the FISC court to justify spying on and then sabotaging the Trump campaign.

- by the top of the DOJ and FBI.

You can take whatever tactical cover you want, call names, it doesn't make a lick of difference to me.

Trump is a goofball, I'm not a partisan, but you're making it very easy to justify folks labeling you as a hyperpartisan.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     The FISA warrant does not specifically name names on - KenMan33 MU - 7/23 11:26:08
          you actually prove our point. why did the affiant throw - blake1771 KC - 7/23 11:27:27
               It spells it out that research was done to discredit Trump's - KenMan33 MU - 7/23 11:46:01
                    The courts do not operate off assumptions - Sal KC - 7/23 11:56:23
                    Oops (nm) - Badird MU - 7/23 11:47:04
     this paragraph is so damning as to be comical - 90Tiger MU - 7/23 11:07:54
          all part of the normal process - TB liberals (nm) - Sal KC - 7/23 11:12:01
     Not so much - raskolnikov MU - 7/23 10:53:34
          the judges don't independently verify the data, dimwit. the - 90Tiger MU - 7/23 11:09:24
               It's amazing how many liberals think this is what happens (nm) - Sal KC - 7/23 11:11:17
          no so much what? (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 7/23 11:08:11
          RE: Not so much - Spanky KU - 7/23 10:56:13
               He can't get past the fact that FISC judges - Sal KC - 7/23 10:57:29
                    all this really proves is the system is broken. if 4th hand - blake1771 KC - 7/23 11:09:20
                         it shows you the egregious overreach of federal powers (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 7/23 11:47:00
                         yep (nm) - Sal KC - 7/23 11:19:06
          Judges don't verify information provided to them (nm) - Sal KC - 7/23 10:55:12
     It clearly does not(nm) - TheShoe STL - 7/23 10:31:12
          Either you can't read or are retarded then - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 7/23 10:45:17
               Likely both can't read and is retarded - mu7176grad MU - 7/23 10:52:09
          It does though - Sal KC - 7/23 10:40:04
               The warrant application clearly stated that the FBI - tigerdb MU - 7/23 10:49:44
                    What half-truths were in the Nunes memo? (nm) - Sal KC - 7/23 10:51:54
                         Read the Nunez memo - it was half truths - tigerdb MU - 7/23 10:57:25
                              they could have thought it was the Free Beacon. - blake1771 KC - 7/23 11:34:09
                              The information clearly supports the Nunes memo - Sal KC - 7/23 10:58:53
                                   Do you think that 4 GOP judges are so STUPID that they - tigerdb MU - 7/23 11:04:05
                                        can you point out the testimony from Steele or Simpson that - blake1771 KC - 7/23 11:40:25
                                             To the best of my knowledge, neither Steele nor Simpson have - tigerdb MU - 7/23 11:49:01
                                        RE: Do you think that 4 GOP judges are so STUPID that they - 90Tiger MU - 7/23 11:10:42
                                             Your links are worthless teetee. - tigerdb MU - 7/23 11:13:47
                                                  You're simply ignorant of process here and now boasting - 90Tiger MU - 7/23 11:16:28
                                                       and you're simply a stupid partisan hack teetee. - tigerdb MU - 7/23 11:27:36
                                                            It's astonishing how you're contorting to justify obvious - 90Tiger MU - 7/23 11:45:56
                                                            It left out some key points though - Sal KC - 7/23 11:28:57
                                                                 such as? (nm) - tigerdb MU - 7/23 11:33:58
                                                                      read it. also ask yourself why the DOJ and FBI would - 90Tiger MU - 7/23 11:47:58
                                                                           I read it dumb ****...the warrant application clearly stated - tigerdb MU - 7/23 11:53:22
                                                                                it didn't state who funded it, why? (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 7/23 12:18:14
                                                                                     Perhaps because it was unknown teetee. - tigerdb MU - 7/23 12:25:11
                                                                                It did not stated who funded it (nm) - Sal KC - 7/23 11:57:05
                                                                                     and this is a perfect example of why Nunez's memo is simply - tigerdb MU - 7/23 12:13:17
                                                                      Can you read? - Sal KC - 7/23 11:42:23
                                                       It's fun to watch though (nm) - Sal KC - 7/23 11:17:01
                                                  The basis for your argument is so wrong it's hilarious(nm) - Sal KC - 7/23 11:14:12
                                        The court does not make assumptions - Sal KC - 7/23 11:05:22
                                             The FBI's assumption for the reason for the research was - tigerdb MU - 7/23 11:11:17
                                                  JFC. Assumptions =/= facts which is all - Sal KC - 7/23 11:12:52
                                                       Yes, you're making an ASSUMPTION that Steele knew for - tigerdb MU - 7/23 11:21:34
                                                            I never once made that assumption - Sal KC - 7/23 11:23:04
          Why don't you take a couple minutes and state - Spanky KU - 7/23 10:35:23
               lol, no - TheShoe STL - 7/23 10:38:01
                    YOUR post was editorial trash. The OP went paragraph - Spanky KU - 7/23 10:41:52
                         RE: YOUR post was editorial trash. The OP went paragraph - TheShoe STL - 7/23 10:43:17
                              Here are some points in that article - Sal KC - 7/23 10:50:27
                                   Yep.... it was a drivel article by a lazy Dem-Lib - Spanky KU - 7/23 10:53:39
                                        Same magazine wrote an article kissing Elizabeth Warrens ass - Calca STL - 7/23 11:23:15
                              Now THAT was editorial nonsense - Spanky KU - 7/23 10:46:17
                    Just admit you're wrong - Sal KC - 7/23 10:41:19
                         I'm not wrong - TheShoe STL - 7/23 10:44:17
                              goddam you are dumb(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 7/23 10:45:55
                              Then provide the evidence - Sal KC - 7/23 10:45:08
          Good, in depth retort. Nm - redngray MU - 7/23 10:34:55
               Does it matter what any of us say? - TheShoe STL - 7/23 10:36:16
                    there was no evidence presented. there was hearsay that was - blake1771 KC - 7/23 11:05:42
                    Well, York went paragraph by paragraph and gave his - MUTGR MU - 7/23 10:42:17
                         That's too hard for shoe to read - Calca STL - 7/23 10:50:37
                    RE: Does it matter what any of us say? - redngray MU - 7/23 10:40:31
                         Like I said - TheShoe STL - 7/23 10:43:07
                              RE: Like I said - Sal KC - 7/23 11:14:51
     Are york and Rx LIMPfAuGh still butt buddies? - JayHoaxH8r MU - 7/23 10:28:23




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard