 |
|
No, the allegations regarding the summer internship of 2014
Posted on: March 29, 2017 at 14:51:30 CT
MizzouTigerz MU
Posts:
37095
Member For:
21.94 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
ended on May 31, prior to summer. The calendar seasons do not change because an institution of higher learning calls a portion of spring summer. That ain't how life works.
Some of the minor allegations which occurred, occurred during the summer of 2014, but have nothing to do with the impermissible benefits related to the internship.
2. [NCAA Division I Manual Bylaws 16.11.2.1, 16.11.2.2 and 16.11.2.2-(d) (2010-11,
2011-12 and 2013-14)] (Level II)
"c. Between July 4 and 6, 2014, representative 2 provided four then men's basketball student-athletes (student-athletes 9, 10, 11 and 12, respectively), with access to a discounted friends and family room rate that was not otherwise available to the University of Missouri, Columbia –
Public Infractions Decision August 2, 2016
Page No. 5
__________
general public. Representative 2 also arranged for student-athletes 1, 9, 10, 11 and 12 to accompany his wife on a boat ride for approximately two hours at no cost.
Additionally, representative 2 paid for at least 12 total meals for the five men's basketball student-athletes, student-athlete 1's mother and his two sisters. The total
value of the impermissible benefits was approximately $406.3
[NCAA Division I Manual Bylaw 16.11.2.1 (2013-14)]
d. Between July 4 and 6, 2014, a then men's basketball student manager provided transportation to student-athletes 9, 11 and 12 from Columbia to the in-state resort. The value of the impermissible transportation was approximately $110.
4. [NCAA Division I Manual Bylaws 13.01.2, 13.1.2.1, 13.1.2.4, 13.1.2.4-(a), 13.1.2.5,
13.1.3.5.1, 13.2.1, 13.2.1.1 and 13.8.1(2012-13 and 2013-14)] (Level III)
The institution and NCAA enforcement staff agree that between 2012 and 2014, representative 1 had multiple impermissible recruiting contacts with a then men's
basketball prospective student-athlete and provided a then nonscholastic men's basketball coach impermissible benefits and entertainment. Specifically:
b. On or about July 17, 2014, during the 2014 Nike Peach Jam elite nonscholastic basketball tournament in Augusta, Georgia, representative 1 paid for the dinner of a then nonscholastic basketball coach, an individual who was responsible for teaching or directing an activity in which a prospective student-athlete is involved. The value of the impermissible entertainment was approximately $50.
[NCAA Division I Manual Bylaws 13.01.2, 13.2.1, 13.2.1.1 and 13.8.1.]
The lack of vetting and lack of institutional control is on the A.D. and Personnel Departments. These matters started in 2011, and ended in 2014. This was part of the house cleaning that had to be done, which was dumped in his lap. How you could think he's responsible and Haith is not is beyond comprehension. It is a not a lucid explanation of the facts and the timeline.
Edited by MizzouTigerz at 14:51:51 on 03/29/17
Some of the minor allegations which occurred, occurred during the summer of 2014, but have nothing to do with the impermissible benefits related to the internship.
2. [NCAA Division I Manual Bylaws 16.11.2.1, 16.11.2.2 and 16.11.2.2-(d) (2010-11,
2011-12 and 2013-14)] (Level II)
"c. Between July 4 and 6, 2014, representative 2 provided four then men's basketball student-athletes (student-athletes 9, 10, 11 and 12, respectively), with access to a discounted friends and family room rate that was not otherwise available to the University of Missouri, Columbia –
Public Infractions Decision August 2, 2016
Page No. 5
__________
general public. Representative 2 also arranged for student-athletes 1, 9, 10, 11 and 12 to accompany his wife on a boat ride for approximately two hours at no cost.
Additionally, representative 2 paid for at least 12 total meals for the five men's basketball student-athletes, student-athlete 1's mother and his two sisters. The total
value of the impermissible benefits was approximately $406.3
[NCAA Division I Manual Bylaw 16.11.2.1 (2013-14)]
d. Between July 4 and 6, 2014, a then men's basketball student manager provided transportation to student-athletes 9, 11 and 12 from Columbia to the in-state resort. The value of the impermissible transportation was approximately $110.
4. [NCAA Division I Manual Bylaws 13.01.2, 13.1.2.1, 13.1.2.4, 13.1.2.4-(a), 13.1.2.5,
13.1.3.5.1, 13.2.1, 13.2.1.1 and 13.8.1(2012-13 and 2013-14)] (Level III)
The institution and NCAA enforcement staff agree that between 2012 and 2014, representative 1 had multiple impermissible recruiting contacts with a then men's
basketball prospective student-athlete and provided a then nonscholastic men's basketball coach impermissible benefits and entertainment. Specifically:
b. On or about July 17, 2014, during the 2014 Nike Peach Jam elite nonscholastic basketball tournament in Augusta, Georgia, representative 1 paid for the dinner of a then nonscholastic basketball coach, an individual who was responsible for teaching or directing an activity in which a prospective student-athlete is involved. The value of the impermissible entertainment was approximately $50.
[NCAA Division I Manual Bylaws 13.01.2, 13.2.1, 13.2.1.1 and 13.8.1.]
The lack of vetting and lack of institutional control is on the A.D. and Personnel Departments. These matters started in 2011, and ended in 2014. This was part of the house cleaning that had to be done, which was dumped in his lap. How you could think he's responsible and Haith is not is beyond comprehension. It is a not a lucid explanation of the facts and the timeline.
Edited by MizzouTigerz at 14:51:51 on 03/29/17
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
No, the allegations regarding the summer internship of 2014 - MizzouTigerz MU - 3/29 14:51:30