Welcome Guest

Sign In | Register

why? I've said why tejas adds nothing and I'm open to

Posted on: July 22, 2021 at 00:35:10 CT

lqf2b8 MU

Posts:

74255

Member For:

15.57 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

0

hearing why I'm wrong.

I just don't see it. The way networks work is you get a premium for your footprint. We already have texas in the footprint so there is no windfall. You could argue the game of the week contract would be higher with them because they are "marquee names"... but tejas hasn't been marquee since the last realignment (hence why they are wanting to move they realize they ****ed up). OU is marquee only relative to the little xii and gets exposed whenever they play a real team. It's not as though the game of the week is having a tough time finding good matchups right now.

Couple that with the fact there are voting blocks inside the SEC that have banded together to keep teams from existing footprints out in the past (SC, Georgia, Florida) and that MU, Arky and A&M would vote a hard no there is very little chance tejas gets in.

You keep saying tejas is so great but why? What do they offer besides an unwarranted ego?

I love MU but the main reason if not only reason we got in the SEC was our untapped TVs. Texas TVs have been tapped.

Edited by lqf2b8 at 00:39:44 on 07/22/21

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

I can see Oklahoma, but why would the SEC take Texas - Blood Green MU - 7/21 22:56:07

Like Alden said - bobbelcher MU - 7/22 07:26:01

RE: Like Alden said - slamduncan KC - 7/22 07:33:45

Because it would help everyone make more money - Johnny Utah MU - 7/22 06:30:39

If the SEC doesn't take them, the Big 10 will. And there - TigerMatt STL - 7/22 01:03:49

I think they would shop themselves West first. Add them BYU - DHighlander NWMSU - 7/22 01:31:28

California has laws about public institutions traveling to - TigerMatt STL - 7/22 01:34:46

Texas and USC did a Home and Home a few years back. - Spartus MWSC - 7/22 06:19:29

I suspect the Pac would ignore that and focus on survival - DHighlander NWMSU - 7/22 01:39:59

RE: I can see Oklahoma, but why would the SEC take Texas - slamduncan KC - 7/21 23:11:49

RE: I can see Oklahoma, but why would the SEC take Texas - MUTGR MU - 7/21 23:19:37

that's not how tv contracts work. Texas adds nothing the SEC - lqf2b8 STL - 7/21 23:26:37

Spoken like someone who thinks cable TV is the future - HissingPrigs77 MU - 7/22 07:46:16

RE: that's not how tv contracts work. Texas adds nothing the SEC - slamduncan KC - 7/22 07:28:21

Longhorns-top college fb brand in largest population state - ScottsdaleTiger MU - 7/22 00:30:51

Read how network contracts work. A&M already gives us the - lqf2b8 STL - 7/22 00:38:13

And the SEC does not want to see either of them pick up - DHighlander NWMSU - 7/22 01:06:56

It isn't just about TV but streaming numbers too now.(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 7/22 01:01:11

Texas adds nothing to the SEC...that's one of the dumber - MUTGR MU - 7/21 23:58:59

TVs are what matters just like the last realignment and - lqf2b8 STL - 7/22 00:00:44

That is infinitely less true than 10 years ago - alwaysright MU - 7/22 10:48:50

I'll bet the SEC office is salivating at the prospect of - MUTGR MU - 7/22 00:19:05

The SEC would have to split the TV revenue 16 ways instead - SSN 780 MU - 7/22 00:37:13

ESPN can save money ditching the rest of the Big 12 and - TigerMatt STL - 7/22 01:07:22

The rest of the Big XII would have legal recourse if ESPN - SSN 780 MU - 7/22 01:18:16

Wrong, without OU and UT ESPN and Fox would make nothing - DHighlander NWMSU - 7/22 01:24:56

The contract is with the Big XII conference and ESPN - SSN 780 MU - 7/22 02:31:10

why? I've said why tejas adds nothing and I'm open to - lqf2b8 STL - 7/22 00:35:10

That was all true in the last go round of realignment. - DHighlander NWMSU - 7/22 00:56:16

All true, except that the timing would make more sense in - SSN 780 MU - 7/22 01:23:58

With this announcement, if true and possibly even if not, - DHighlander NWMSU - 7/22 01:36:59

I think this is a play between ESPN/SEC and Fox/Big 10. - TigerMatt STL - 7/22 01:31:18

I think is is safe to assume that the other four P5 - DHighlander NWMSU - 7/22 01:45:50

If they go to the PAC and this bring about another round - lqf2b8 STL - 7/21 23:34:40

I would prefer OU & OSU anyway(nm) - tigerinhogtown STL - 7/21 23:07:55

RE: I can see Oklahoma, but why would the SEC take Texas - VirginiaGator UF - 7/21 23:05:43

Plus, I imagine the SEC big dog schools are pretty confident - TigerJackSwartz MU

- 7/21 23:14:28

I hope you're right about Bama, etc.... - Blood Green MU - 7/21 23:26:50

OU is a traditional power and Texas, the state, has about 30 - MUTGR MU - 7/21 23:13:55

DeLoss Dodds was negotiating to move Texas to the B1G, - SSN 780 MU - 7/22 00:22:36

That's the ONLY reason I'd understand it. From a Mizzou - bcoop199 KC - 7/21 23:08:14

Texas will never be in the SEC… - Tigergrad MU - 7/21 23:55:51

You are very, very wrong about A&M having that power - HissingPrigs77 MU - 7/22 07:43:23

No A&M does not have that power.(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 7/22 01:04:55

Nothing in writing. But the SEC still has a strong good ol - DHighlander NWMSU - 7/22 01:10:32

The SEC has a stronger good 'ol money ethic - HissingPrigs77 MU - 7/22 07:43:57

Depends... if Auburn/Alabama get moved to the East it - TigerMatt STL - 7/22 01:33:32

If this were to happen the Sooners would join as the second - DHighlander NWMSU - 7/22 01:50:04

©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy About Tigerboard