Missouri Tigers Athletics :: Mizzou College Sports :: TigerBoard.com :: And some CFO's embezzle from their company

lol MS - SwampTiger MU - 7/9 08:12:45

What a ***** - Panthera MU - 7/9 09:27:09

Why the lol? - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/9 09:13:04

See ummms post below - meatiger MU - 7/9 09:19:43

So is it your contention if enough people want to do - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/9 09:21:38

which boundaries of the law is the initiative outside of? - ashtray UF - 7/9 09:28:44

No - meatiger MU - 7/9 09:28:06

Where did the court not do its job? - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/9 09:29:43

It was a technicality - meatiger MU - 7/9 09:31:46

So you clearly don't understand the difference between the - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/9 09:32:26

What is the difference when it comes to enforcement of - ummmm MU - 7/9 09:48:56

Law enforcement has discretion on when or when not - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/9 09:49:48

How were their dissenting judges in this opinion?? - ummmm MU - 7/9 09:52:22

Because people have differing views on the law - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/9 09:55:57

Differing views on the law and how it applies = discretion.(nm) - ummmm MU - 7/9 09:59:02

And for the third time, they do have some discretion - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/9 09:59:58

Judges do that ALL THE TIME. - ummmm MU - 7/9 10:01:23

Justices created a right to privacy out of nothing - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/9 10:02:26

Yeah, but they did it. (nm) - ummmm MU - 7/9 10:03:10

And some CFO's embezzle from their company - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/9 10:05:31

Bad analogy. The right of privacy that was concocted by - ummmm MU - 7/9 10:09:37

The point being bad practice does not make the practice - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/9 10:12:38

they don't stop cars for going 71 in a 70 only because - ashtray UF - 7/9 10:49:02

Where is this discretion given?(nm) - meatiger MU - 7/9 10:13:31

In their role as law enforcement - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/9 10:15:27

Where is it written? - ummmm MU - 7/9 10:16:09

What part of judges having certain discretion don't you get? - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/9 10:17:58

RE: What part of judges having certain discretion don't you get? - ummmm MU - 7/9 10:22:18

You don't think judges have discretion? - ummmm MU - 7/9 09:51:43

I said elsewhere they have discretion - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/9 09:56:45

Judges do that all the time. Just like your cool sheriff. - ummmm MU - 7/9 10:00:38

My cool sheriff is not a judge - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/9 10:03:05

same oath of office, i think(nm) - gmmm98 MU

- 7/9 12:46:44

Interestingly, you would probably call the Sheriff a "law - ummmm MU - 7/9 10:04:33

The judge's role is not law enforcement - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/9 10:07:50

Everywhere else in this thread, you keep saying that the - ummmm MU - 7/9 10:11:16

It is part of the law enforcement process - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/9 10:14:23

RE: It is part of the law enforcement process - ummmm MU - 7/9 10:16:44

See below - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/9 10:20:49

I read that wrong - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/9 10:19:45

The point does not remain. - ummmm MU - 7/9 10:23:40

No idea why he can't admit that - meatiger MU - 7/9 11:03:05

It is called law enforcement - meatiger MU - 7/9 10:11:03

You just made me laugh out loud again - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/9 10:15:52

As you should - meatiger MU - 7/9 11:03:51

The question is not about popular opinion - meatiger MU - 7/9 09:57:49

The OP brought the 74% into the dicussion - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/9 09:59:14

so if a police officer arrests me - meatiger MU - 7/9 09:34:59

So you don't understand the roles of the legislative branch, - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/9 09:38:17

What cracks me up is your definition of law and order - meatiger MU - 7/9 09:41:07

The sheriff had discretion on when to make an arrest - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/9 09:47:05

and a judge has discretion on whether the intent of the law - ashtray UF - 7/9 10:53:17

That is not LAW and ORDER - meatiger MU - 7/9 09:51:19

It most certainly is - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/9 09:58:18

Barney Fife is a fictional character - meatiger MU - 7/9 10:09:49

And he was included for a reason - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/9 10:16:56

using their brains - ashtray UF - 7/9 09:30:42

false dichotomy (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 7/9 09:13:49

Seriously, what is funny about what happened? - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/9 09:20:19

Why the lol? - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/9 09:15:09

the entire farce - SwampTiger MU - 7/9 09:20:22

So you are in favor of courts interpreting laws by means - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/9 09:23:22

false premise (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 7/9 09:25:19

No it is not - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/9 09:26:24

You find that admirable? - meatiger MU - 7/9 09:29:06

The court has a job to do - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/9 09:30:48

So the court should not use discretion? - meatiger MU - 7/9 09:32:35

There are differences in discretion - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/9 09:33:39

they do have discretion to apply the law as it was intended - ashtray UF - 7/9 10:55:37

But cops can ignore laws?(nm) - meatiger MU - 7/9 09:35:20

They should not ignore laws - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/9 09:39:21

that's the same thing as ignoring laws (nm) - ashtray UF - 7/9 10:55:54

Why should a court not have that same discretion? - meatiger MU - 7/9 09:42:30

Study the role of the courts versus the role of the - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/9 09:45:29

take your own advice (nm) - ashtray UF - 7/9 10:56:14

I understand the roles - meatiger MU - 7/9 09:46:52

No, you have demonstrated again and again just the - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/9 09:47:30

"... want the law ignored" - SwampTiger MU - 7/9 09:28:54

Did the Supreme Court act in accordance with the law - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/9 09:31:23

no, they did not apply the intent of the law (nm) - ashtray UF - 7/9 10:54:16

idk what their law says on courts interpreting the const - SwampTiger MU - 7/9 09:37:03

Humor is subjective - clearly in this instance(nm) - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/9 09:40:02

you didn't answer the question (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 7/9 09:42:25

I don't understand the question - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/9 09:48:56

no - SwampTiger MU - 7/9 09:57:34

Therein lies the challenge - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/9 10:01:34

so you don't know if they acted in accordance with the law?(nm) - SwampTiger MU - 7/9 10:57:47

yes there is a standard (nm) - ashtray UF - 7/9 10:54:55

consent of the governed (nm) - pickle MU

- 7/9 09:16:24

The court WOULD overturn that - kmawv8 KC - 7/9 08:48:12

Read the article before posting. - kmawv8 KC - 7/9 08:44:36

First, it's not an article, it's a bunch of tweets. Second, - hokie VT - 7/9 09:12:30

it was still obvious - ashtray UF - 7/9 09:19:26

try paying attention (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 7/9 09:16:27

you’re an idiot, hokie (nm) - pickle MU

- 7/9 09:15:29

hokkie is like a p*ssed off cat (nm) - ashtray UF - 7/9 08:48:11

It was struck down because a Mississippi statute prohibits - ummmm MU - 7/9 08:30:41

One edit: That requirement is in the Mississippi state - ummmm MU - 7/9 08:58:22

How did it even get to the ballot - meatiger MU - 7/9 08:48:33

I think because those that certify ballot initiatives were - ummmm MU - 7/9 08:53:19

Interesting - meatiger MU - 7/9 08:55:02

because people were using common sense(nm) - MizzouAstro MU

- 7/9 08:52:02

Sounds like Mississippi voters are not voting in the - kmawv8 KC - 7/9 08:45:47

will of the people, consent of the governed - pickle MU

- 7/9 08:42:43

you’re an idiot, hokie (nm) - pickle MU

- 7/9 08:24:04

RE: you’re an idiot: Pot, meet kettle. - BH O'bonga MU - 7/9 08:41:23

you have nothing (nm) - pickle MU

- 7/9 09:00:51

I sometimes wonder if he and JeffB are the same poster - ashtray UF - 7/9 09:02:40

yep (nm) - pickle MU

- 7/9 09:13:29

what is a Libertarian? (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 7/9 08:50:49

lol(nm) - meatiger MU - 7/9 08:22:38

that's not what I'm saying (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 7/9 08:19:08

How is that even possible? (nm) - Sal CMSU - 7/9 08:14:12

their supreme court - SwampTiger MU - 7/9 08:24:33

goddam (nm) - Sal CMSU - 7/9 08:25:33

And some CFO's embezzle from their company

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD