Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

i think you're giving too much credit to many

Posted on: May 29, 2019 at 17:42:40 CT
gmmm98 MU
Posts:
13786
Member For:
15.21 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
with the "that's where the argument is. the vast majority of conservative pundits...". or at least if that's what they intend that sure as hell isn't what they convey.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

I disagree with many re obstruction. The common thinking - hokie VT - 5/29 15:34:56
     agree in principle but it would take overt steps like - blake1771 KC - 5/29 17:05:22
          i think you're giving too much credit to many - gmmm98 MU - 5/29 17:42:40
     Legal opinion is that attempting to obstruct an investigatio - raskolnikov MU - 5/29 16:07:42
          Whose legal opinion is that? Link? Not that i don't - hokie VT - 5/29 16:10:30
               Former Federal Prosecutors - raskolnikov MU - 5/29 16:27:08
     If there can be a prosecutable obstruction of justice, yet - GA Tiger MU - 5/29 15:54:31
          It isn't like that at all - raskolnikov MU - 5/29 16:09:56
               no it isnt you fool. i'll explain this one last time for you - blake1771 KC - 5/29 17:12:50
                    Pretty funny - raskolnikov MU - 5/29 17:39:57
                         Your brainwashing is the most complete I have ever seen. - GA Tiger MU - 5/29 18:42:01
          That is a fair point and you and Alf give me pause. But - hokie VT - 5/29 15:58:14
               I would say it’s possible to have obstruction without an - DHighlander NWMSU - 5/29 16:10:15
                    Hmmm, i would think that generally, it would be EASIER - hokie VT - 5/29 16:13:09
                         My point was that as chief executive he had the LEGAL - DHighlander NWMSU - 5/29 16:19:06
                              We disagree. THAT would seem obvious to the point of - hokie VT - 5/29 16:22:18
                                   You disagree that he had the legal authority?(nm) - DHighlander NWMSU - 5/29 16:25:07
     The necessary condition for obstruction, as repeatedly state - Alferd Packer MU - 5/29 15:52:28
          You're wrong - raskolnikov MU - 5/29 16:11:43
               RE: You're wrong - MOCO SON MU - 5/29 17:02:17
          Stewart and Libby wish you were right(nm) - Mo Texan MU - 5/29 16:07:02
          That's my point and i can see areas where the obstruction is - hokie VT - 5/29 15:55:20
               You surely know a permitted investigation of something else - GA Tiger MU - 5/29 16:00:00
                    I don't think that's exactly the same. A search warrant - hokie VT - 5/29 16:01:38
                         Yes, and that SW is the permitted investigation of - GA Tiger MU - 5/29 16:05:38
               RE: That's my point and i can see areas where the obstruction is - MOCO SON MU - 5/29 15:59:02
                    I'm not saying he did. My point was to the letter of the - hokie VT - 5/29 16:03:38
                         RE: I'm not saying he did. My point was to the letter of the - MOCO SON MU - 5/29 17:00:04
     should the conservative media be sent to prison - SwampTiger MU - 5/29 15:40:59
          No. Wanna discuss my point? nm - hokie VT - 5/29 15:43:31
               no (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 5/29 15:44:06
                    RE: no (nm) - scan MU - 5/29 15:45:35
                         or for people answering questions (nm) - pickle MU - 5/29 15:49:46
                         It's the soul of wit. In his case, "The As Soul of Wit." nm - hokie VT - 5/29 15:48:04




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard