Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

RE: I'm not saying he did. My point was to the letter of the

Posted on: May 29, 2019 at 17:00:04 CT
MOCO SON MU
Posts:
29635
Member For:
8.78 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Then if a potential crime can't be identified, there is zero need for needless investigations attempting to discover/create the same!
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

I disagree with many re obstruction. The common thinking - hokie VT - 5/29 15:34:56
     agree in principle but it would take overt steps like - blake1771 KC - 5/29 17:05:22
          i think you're giving too much credit to many - gmmm98 MU - 5/29 17:42:40
     Legal opinion is that attempting to obstruct an investigatio - raskolnikov MU - 5/29 16:07:42
          Whose legal opinion is that? Link? Not that i don't - hokie VT - 5/29 16:10:30
               Former Federal Prosecutors - raskolnikov MU - 5/29 16:27:08
     If there can be a prosecutable obstruction of justice, yet - GA Tiger MU - 5/29 15:54:31
          It isn't like that at all - raskolnikov MU - 5/29 16:09:56
               no it isnt you fool. i'll explain this one last time for you - blake1771 KC - 5/29 17:12:50
                    Pretty funny - raskolnikov MU - 5/29 17:39:57
                         Your brainwashing is the most complete I have ever seen. - GA Tiger MU - 5/29 18:42:01
          That is a fair point and you and Alf give me pause. But - hokie VT - 5/29 15:58:14
               I would say it’s possible to have obstruction without an - DHighlander NWMSU - 5/29 16:10:15
                    Hmmm, i would think that generally, it would be EASIER - hokie VT - 5/29 16:13:09
                         My point was that as chief executive he had the LEGAL - DHighlander NWMSU - 5/29 16:19:06
                              We disagree. THAT would seem obvious to the point of - hokie VT - 5/29 16:22:18
                                   You disagree that he had the legal authority?(nm) - DHighlander NWMSU - 5/29 16:25:07
     The necessary condition for obstruction, as repeatedly state - Alferd Packer MU - 5/29 15:52:28
          You're wrong - raskolnikov MU - 5/29 16:11:43
               RE: You're wrong - MOCO SON MU - 5/29 17:02:17
          Stewart and Libby wish you were right(nm) - Mo Texan MU - 5/29 16:07:02
          That's my point and i can see areas where the obstruction is - hokie VT - 5/29 15:55:20
               You surely know a permitted investigation of something else - GA Tiger MU - 5/29 16:00:00
                    I don't think that's exactly the same. A search warrant - hokie VT - 5/29 16:01:38
                         Yes, and that SW is the permitted investigation of - GA Tiger MU - 5/29 16:05:38
               RE: That's my point and i can see areas where the obstruction is - MOCO SON MU - 5/29 15:59:02
                    I'm not saying he did. My point was to the letter of the - hokie VT - 5/29 16:03:38
                         RE: I'm not saying he did. My point was to the letter of the - MOCO SON MU - 5/29 17:00:04
     should the conservative media be sent to prison - SwampTiger MU - 5/29 15:40:59
          No. Wanna discuss my point? nm - hokie VT - 5/29 15:43:31
               no (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 5/29 15:44:06
                    RE: no (nm) - scan MU - 5/29 15:45:35
                         or for people answering questions (nm) - pickle MU - 5/29 15:49:46
                         It's the soul of wit. In his case, "The As Soul of Wit." nm - hokie VT - 5/29 15:48:04




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard