Welcome Guest

I'm not saying he did. My point was to the letter of the

Posted on: May 29, 2019 at 16:03:38 CT

hokie VT

Posts:

67464

Member For:

9.52 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

law (as i understand it) as it applies to the obstruction charge and that it seems to require that there be a specified and underlying crime committed by the person being investigated in order for a technical case of obstruction to be valid.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

I disagree with many re obstruction. The common thinking - hokie VT - 5/29 15:34:56

agree in principle but it would take overt steps like - blake1771 KC - 5/29 17:05:22

i think you're giving too much credit to many - gmmm98 MU

- 5/29 17:42:40

Legal opinion is that attempting to obstruct an investigatio - raskolnikov MU - 5/29 16:07:42

Whose legal opinion is that? Link? Not that i don't - hokie VT - 5/29 16:10:30

Former Federal Prosecutors - raskolnikov MU - 5/29 16:27:08

If there can be a prosecutable obstruction of justice, yet - GA Tiger MU - 5/29 15:54:31

It isn't like that at all - raskolnikov MU - 5/29 16:09:56

no it isnt you fool. i'll explain this one last time for you - blake1771 KC - 5/29 17:12:50

Pretty funny - raskolnikov MU - 5/29 17:39:57

Your brainwashing is the most complete I have ever seen. - GA Tiger MU - 5/29 18:42:01

That is a fair point and you and Alf give me pause. But - hokie VT - 5/29 15:58:14

I would say it’s possible to have obstruction without an - DHighlander NWMSU - 5/29 16:10:15

Hmmm, i would think that generally, it would be EASIER - hokie VT - 5/29 16:13:09

My point was that as chief executive he had the LEGAL - DHighlander NWMSU - 5/29 16:19:06

We disagree. THAT would seem obvious to the point of - hokie VT - 5/29 16:22:18

You disagree that he had the legal authority?(nm) - DHighlander NWMSU - 5/29 16:25:07

The necessary condition for obstruction, as repeatedly state - Alferd Packer MU

- 5/29 15:52:28

You're wrong - raskolnikov MU - 5/29 16:11:43

RE: You're wrong - MOCO SON MU - 5/29 17:02:17

Stewart and Libby wish you were right(nm) - Mo Texan MU - 5/29 16:07:02

That's my point and i can see areas where the obstruction is - hokie VT - 5/29 15:55:20

You surely know a permitted investigation of something else - GA Tiger MU - 5/29 16:00:00

I don't think that's exactly the same. A search warrant - hokie VT - 5/29 16:01:38

Yes, and that SW is the permitted investigation of - GA Tiger MU - 5/29 16:05:38

RE: That's my point and i can see areas where the obstruction is - MOCO SON MU - 5/29 15:59:02

I'm not saying he did. My point was to the letter of the - hokie VT - 5/29 16:03:38

RE: I'm not saying he did. My point was to the letter of the - MOCO SON MU - 5/29 17:00:04

should the conservative media be sent to prison - SwampTiger MU - 5/29 15:40:59

No. Wanna discuss my point? nm - hokie VT - 5/29 15:43:31

no (nm) - SwampTiger MU - 5/29 15:44:06

RE: no (nm) - scan MU - 5/29 15:45:35

or for people answering questions (nm) - pickle MU

- 5/29 15:49:46

It's the soul of wit. In his case, "The As Soul of Wit." nm - hokie VT - 5/29 15:48:04