Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

I suppose I don't understand how the clause that

Posted on: August 9, 2017 at 15:08:00 CT
ummmm MU
Posts:
44901
Member For:
12.87 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
allows Congress to define international law also empowers Congress to make certain national laws. I'll also point out that not even Congress (or your precious SCOTUS) has ever explicitly relied on this Law of Nations clause.

It is a unique argument, but it does not explicitly grant a power to control immigration to the federal government. That power is reserved to the states.

Also, it doesn't appear that you care since you claim it is implied, so why work so hard to find a clause that roughly allows it?
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Law of Nations: Immigration in US Constitution. - Alferd Packer MU - 8/9 14:50:28
     Also: - ummmm MU - 8/9 15:25:07
     Sorry, AP, but no. - pickle MU - 8/9 15:07:17
          I knew somebody would claim that without checking - Alferd Packer MU - 8/9 15:40:13
               That doesn't refute my post - pickle MU - 8/9 15:45:42
                    You think you found a loophole but you didn't. - Alferd Packer MU - 8/9 16:03:00
                         No. Congress is not the Sovereign - pickle MU - 8/9 16:09:12
                              The government is the sovereign according to deV. - Alferd Packer MU - 8/9 16:25:32
                                   Sorry, but no (nm) - pickle MU - 8/9 16:50:09
                                        So, explain what this means if not what it says. - Alferd Packer MU - 8/9 20:27:18
                    opps (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 8/9 15:54:25
     What happened to this angle? - ummmm MU - 8/9 14:55:00
          I have said it is a state power, but this is an interesting - tman KC - 8/9 15:32:49
               That's some odd logic - pickle MU - 8/9 15:38:09
                    Wut. I will type slow - tman KC - 8/9 15:50:44
                         This doesn't address my post at all (nm) - pickle MU - 8/9 15:52:40
          RE: What happened to this angle? - 90Tiger MU - 8/9 15:02:57
          Who cares? - Alferd Packer MU - 8/9 15:00:25
               I suppose I don't understand how the clause that - ummmm MU - 8/9 15:08:00
               Awesome (nm) - pickle MU - 8/9 15:01:01
                    Oh good, the argument has been decided forever! (nm) - tigerspy MU - 8/9 15:01:36
                         This is funny(nm) - tman KC - 8/9 15:16:42
                              it should be educational for you, but I doubt you'll take - 90Tiger MU - 8/9 15:26:57
                                   I will put my constitutional education up against yours any - tman KC - 8/9 15:33:54
                                        I'm going to grant you the superior education and argue - 90Tiger MU - 8/9 15:55:01
                                             You are entitled to do so, but you might actually - tman KC - 8/9 15:56:50
                                                  I'm going to claim being correct since you obviously didn - 90Tiger MU - 8/9 16:06:56
                                                       I have read UMMs arguement and have responded to it several - tman KC - 8/9 16:30:48
                                                            so you agree the courts ruled incorrectly, good. I'm - 90Tiger MU - 8/9 19:02:32
                                                            The courts have mostly relied on it being an implied - ummmm MU - 8/9 17:26:56
                                                                 yup. (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 8/9 19:03:02
                                                       His education and knowledge are so great - pickle MU - 8/9 16:11:18
                                                            He, like AP, is apparently following the US gov'ts path o - 90Tiger MU - 8/9 16:20:31
                                                                 You are worse then the libs on this board - tman KC - 8/9 16:32:12
                                                  Irony (nm) - pickle MU - 8/9 16:06:15
                                        Go for it (nm) - pickle MU - 8/9 15:38:35
                                             Are you and 90 the same person? - tman KC - 8/9 15:53:44
                                                  Oh, I see - pickle MU - 8/9 16:02:05
                                                       Good everyone should. (nm) - tman KC - 8/9 16:36:07
                                                            Can't say I agree - pickle MU - 8/9 16:49:19
                                                  Is it a premise here that those who instructed you were - 90Tiger MU - 8/9 15:57:06
                                                       You started the educational piece not me. - tman KC - 8/9 16:35:20
     Junior high level argument incoming in 3, 2, 1... (nm) - tigerspy MU - 8/9 14:52:07
          psst - your post appeared when your count went to 0 (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 8/9 15:03:38
               Hmm... that was more grade school level. (nm) - tigerspy MU - 8/9 15:07:25
                    You just made his day - JG MU - 8/9 15:22:01




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard