RE: No, ideas and laws are concrete in the sense that they are
Posted on: July 25, 2017 at 14:34:34 CT
ummmm MU
Posts:
44902
Member For:
13.64 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
"A logical proof requires a premise that can be agreed upon by all and then a set of valid logical arguments that take you from that premise to the conclusion. "
The premise of a logical proof does not have to be agreed upon by all. Where are you pulling that non-sense from?
The premise of natural rights is that each individual has a superior right to their own life, over all other individuals. From that premise, you can determine that anything that person creates from use of his own body and mind belongs to him, and he has a superior right to that property. From there, that person can trade his property rights, as he wishes, with other persons for their property rights. This is a nutshell version of the inherent nature of humans, and their rights to their own life and their own property.
As an aside, concrete vs. abstract: concrete = tangible, abstract = intangible. You were operating with a different definition of concrete, as constitutional laws are as intangible as non-constitutional laws.