 |
|
Well you didn't stop at making the moral argument. You state
Posted on: December 5, 2016 at 10:58:44 CT
90Tiger STL
Posts:
163302
Member For:
23.36 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
d the business owner is free of responsibility because the underlying safety codes are immoral.
My pendulum is just fine, you'r having difficulty accepting that I can understand liberty and agree with your moral position here while still rendering appropriate, objective judgment given the context in which we actually live.
Not holding the business owner accountable for his fraud on the basis of govt regulations being immoral isn't taking a stand for liberty, it's obfuscating the issue and conflating his moral error with that of the governments - both parties are wrong here, not just govt.
My pendulum is just fine, you'r having difficulty accepting that I can understand liberty and agree with your moral position here while still rendering appropriate, objective judgment given the context in which we actually live.
Not holding the business owner accountable for his fraud on the basis of govt regulations being immoral isn't taking a stand for liberty, it's obfuscating the issue and conflating his moral error with that of the governments - both parties are wrong here, not just govt.
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
- 
Well you didn't stop at making the moral argument. You state - 90Tiger MU - 12/5 10:58:44