ok, then take Duke for example. It's a 501(c)(3) that uses
Posted on: January 13, 2025 at 17:29:32 CT
zounami MU
Posts:
69615
Member For:
10.73 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
56
the revenue to pay its top coaches $5M+ year, without issue from the IRS.
Why couldn't it do the same with players?
And btw, the 22% spending cap of the House settlement is not legally enforceable. From the article linked to in the OP:
While the pending $2.8 billion dollar settlement of the House v. NCAA case would free the college sports industry from past alleged antitrust violations, it does not provide protection from future legal challenges to the spending caps and other restrictions included as part of the settlement.
Duke could pay its players whatever it wants and, in all likelihood, there's still not a goddamn thing the NCAA could do about it due to antitrust laws.