1. That's not a study. It's an "insight"

Posted on: May 4, 2021 at 09:16:02 CT

Here's the evidence that supports their "insight":

1: "In recent laboratory experiments, multilayer cloth masks were more effective than single-layer masks, blocking as much as 50% to 70% of exhaled small droplets and particles.2,3 In some cases, cloth masks have performed similar to surgical or procedure masks for source control."

This is called in vitro research. The same in vitro research shows that both hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin are both very potent inhibitors and have lethal effects against SARS-CoV-2. Would you say that there is evidence that everybody exposed to COVID-19 should take these medications?


2: A chart is provided with case reports that claim that mask wearing prevented spread. In absolutely every reort, there is no control group. Even more laughable, in the reports claiming that mandatory mask mandates were correlated with a decrease in transmission after mandates were implemented is a riot. By that logic, the fact that rates fell in Texas AFTER mandatory mask mandates were rescinded provides the same evidence that not requiring masks is associated with declining transmissions. The authors also selectively ignored reports of cases skyrocketing after certain jurisdictions implemented shut downs and mask mandates. This is called selection bias.

This was a very nice editorial by some well meaning doctors. There are some other well meaning doctors that the Qtards link to that say everything from vaccines are poison and that HQN is the magic cure.

Think for yourself and respect the individual.