Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

No it wouldn't be

Posted on: January 25, 2019 at 10:17:05 CT
Ragnar Danneskjold MU
Posts:
81634
Member For:
20.20 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
the intent is irrelevant.

It is not illegal to obtain or publish illegally hacked emails.

It's a first amendment thing.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

So who can explain to me why Mueller's team - Sal KC - 1/25 09:14:20
     A few possibilities - meatiger MU - 1/25 09:21:41
     A possibility - you charge the process crimes - Mormad MU - 1/25 09:18:40
          In order to "work up the chain" for Russian conspiracy - Sal KC - 1/25 09:26:38
               Can be added later(nm) - Mormad MU - 1/25 09:27:49
                    the logistics of that make little sense (nm) - Sal KC - 1/25 09:30:21
                         It's irrelevant with Stone anyway, the illegal act is the - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/25 09:39:33
                              Actually, if I'm remembering correctly - and not saying that - Mormad MU - 1/25 09:45:38
                                   you are correct, however there is no crime at all here - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/25 09:48:17
                                        Which might explain why Stone wasn't charged with conspiracy - Mormad MU - 1/25 09:51:10
                                             No I don't think you're following - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/25 09:55:12
                                                  I guess that's the big question to be answered, isn't it? - Mormad MU - 1/25 09:58:09
                                                       No it's pretty much settled law - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/25 10:02:46
                                                       And I would want as many "overt acts" as I could get - Mormad MU - 1/25 10:00:00
                                                            You can have all the overt acts you want - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/25 10:03:52
                                                                 I agree with that statement - Mormad MU - 1/25 10:11:50
                                                                      No it wouldn't be - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/25 10:17:05
                                                                           Right, but that's not the crime - Mormad MU - 1/25 10:22:45
                                                                 BUT THERE COULD BE A CRIME! lol (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 1/25 10:07:24
                         Isn't that the track they took with Cohen - Mormad MU - 1/25 09:32:01
          Stone was one or two people removed from Drumpf - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/25 09:21:50
          Stone won't flip. He's got "guts"! - TigerJackSwartz MU - 1/25 09:19:51
               He's stubborn enough that he may not - Mormad MU - 1/25 09:23:44
     He pi$$ed people off by being arrogant, uncooperative a - 90Tiger MU - 1/25 09:16:11




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard