Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

Actually, if I'm remembering correctly - and not saying that

Posted on: January 25, 2019 at 09:45:38 CT
Mormad MU
Posts:
56694
Member For:
18.71 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
I am, I believe a conspiracy requires an "overt act" in furtherance of the crime. I'm not sure that the "overt act" in and of itself has to be criminal. It can be an act that, in the abstract, is perfectly normal and legal, but when added to the facts, becomes a necessary check in the boxes needed to charge conspiracy.

I'm not saying that's the case, just that I think I've heard that before, so it suggests a possibility.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

So who can explain to me why Mueller's team - Sal KC - 1/25 09:14:20
     A few possibilities - meatiger MU - 1/25 09:21:41
     A possibility - you charge the process crimes - Mormad MU - 1/25 09:18:40
          In order to "work up the chain" for Russian conspiracy - Sal KC - 1/25 09:26:38
               Can be added later(nm) - Mormad MU - 1/25 09:27:49
                    the logistics of that make little sense (nm) - Sal KC - 1/25 09:30:21
                         It's irrelevant with Stone anyway, the illegal act is the - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/25 09:39:33
                              Actually, if I'm remembering correctly - and not saying that - Mormad MU - 1/25 09:45:38
                                   you are correct, however there is no crime at all here - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/25 09:48:17
                                        Which might explain why Stone wasn't charged with conspiracy - Mormad MU - 1/25 09:51:10
                                             No I don't think you're following - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/25 09:55:12
                                                  I guess that's the big question to be answered, isn't it? - Mormad MU - 1/25 09:58:09
                                                       No it's pretty much settled law - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/25 10:02:46
                                                       And I would want as many "overt acts" as I could get - Mormad MU - 1/25 10:00:00
                                                            You can have all the overt acts you want - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/25 10:03:52
                                                                 I agree with that statement - Mormad MU - 1/25 10:11:50
                                                                      No it wouldn't be - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/25 10:17:05
                                                                           Right, but that's not the crime - Mormad MU - 1/25 10:22:45
                                                                 BUT THERE COULD BE A CRIME! lol (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 1/25 10:07:24
                         Isn't that the track they took with Cohen - Mormad MU - 1/25 09:32:01
          Stone was one or two people removed from Drumpf - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 1/25 09:21:50
          Stone won't flip. He's got "guts"! - TigerJackSwartz MU - 1/25 09:19:51
               He's stubborn enough that he may not - Mormad MU - 1/25 09:23:44
     He pi$$ed people off by being arrogant, uncooperative a - 90Tiger MU - 1/25 09:16:11




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard