That is the exact opposite, and also not credible, because
Posted on: April 19, 2017 at 16:36:24 CT
MizzouTigerz
MU
Posts:
37095
Member For:
21.93 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
we have been told that the only reason Romar was fired was because he was losing Porter II. But if Porter 1 made the decision to leave because Romar was going to be, not had been, fired; then, Romar wasn't getting fired for Porter leaving.
Your version is a more realistic possibility, but also not true, unless you are saying (and can prove) that all these people who have said this is not what happened are liars who were lying.