Welcome Guest

the question is the motivation for the order

Posted on: February 10, 2017 at 08:50:37 CT
gmmm98 MU
Posts:
13786
Member For:
15.35 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
and that is a pertinent topic because the order gives preference for religious minorities. the court is obligated to look beyond the face of the order in an establishment clause analysis in determining if the order was motivated by a discriminatory purpose.

the court is not limited to review of the four corners of the order. trump's campaign statements, giuliani's claim, and trump's clarification that the order is designed to give preference to christians are all relevant.

Edited by gmmm98 at 08:51:24 on 02/10/17
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     SC won't even hear this case. - catbirdseat MU - 2/10 07:57:40
          There is no legal case here. The president has almost - DHighlander KC - 2/10 08:08:48
               the question isn't whether the order is consistent with 1182 - gmmm98 MU - 2/10 08:21:16
                    Judical review does not mean the judges get to question the - DHighlander KC - 2/10 08:31:52
                         equal protection strict scrutiny analysis - gmmm98 MU - 2/10 08:55:48
               almost - catbirdseat MU - 2/10 08:10:53
                    It does not matter what he said. What matters is what was - DHighlander KC - 2/10 08:38:02
                         the question is the motivation for the order - gmmm98 MU - 2/10 08:50:37




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard