Welcome Guest

It does not matter what he said. What matters is what was

Posted on: February 10, 2017 at 08:38:02 CT

DHighlander NWMSU

Posts:

51160

Member For:

16.87 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

put to paper. This was not a Muslim ban, a Muslim ban would attempt to ban ALL Muslims and would not ban non-Muslims.

Rudy Giuliani is not a member of Trump's cabinet but they used his statements in trying to determine the intent of this EO. What? really? How does what some random third party have to say show the intent?

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

I do not think Trump should take this fight to a 4-4 SC. - DHighlander KC - 2/10 07:55:01

it wouldn't surprise me if the ussc declined to take it up - gmmm98 MU - 2/10 08:01:49

SC won't even hear this case. - catbirdseat MU

- 2/10 07:57:40

There is no legal case here. The president has almost - DHighlander KC - 2/10 08:08:48

the question isn't whether the order is consistent with 1182 - gmmm98 MU - 2/10 08:21:16

Judical review does not mean the judges get to question the - DHighlander KC - 2/10 08:31:52

equal protection strict scrutiny analysis - gmmm98 MU - 2/10 08:55:48

almost - catbirdseat MU

- 2/10 08:10:53

It does not matter what he said. What matters is what was - DHighlander KC - 2/10 08:38:02

the question is the motivation for the order - gmmm98 MU - 2/10 08:50:37