 |
|
the question isn't whether the order is consistent with 1182
Posted on: February 10, 2017 at 08:21:16 CT
gmmm98 MU
Posts:
13786
Member For:
15.35 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
or whether 1182 is itself constitutional. the question is whether the eo is constitutional. it is not.
"their job was not to rule on the content of the eo" can you explain what you mean by this? the court is not imposing its judgment on whether the order is good or bad policy.
the notion that the order is not subject to judicial review is the one without precedent. i don't think you're suggesting that here, though many have.
"their job was not to rule on the content of the eo" can you explain what you mean by this? the court is not imposing its judgment on whether the order is good or bad policy.
the notion that the order is not subject to judicial review is the one without precedent. i don't think you're suggesting that here, though many have.
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
the question isn't whether the order is consistent with 1182 - gmmm98 MU - 2/10 08:21:16