Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

This is a totally different discussion then. Reducing

Posted on: December 2, 2016 at 12:47:59 CT
90Tiger STL
Posts:
163302
Member For:
23.36 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
corporate taxes =/= a "subsidy".

Your argument appears to be "corporate taxes should be determined based on the fairness of their executive compensation and overall fiscal well-being", or something to that effect.

Corporate tax rates
Executive Pay

These cannot be linked via tax policy that I know of nor do I have any interest in it.

Ideologically, it sounds like you want a magic formula that makes corporate rates just low enough to have companies want to be here and invest and make money, but if they make too much money or spend more of their revenue on execs than the little guy, they should be taxed higher.

In reality, the little guy will always be fvcked by the executive. If you raise corp taxes (eliminate the subsidy as you call it), they will simply hold more cash and still pay the execs and fvck the little guy.

corp tax policy can't "fix" executive compensation.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Four legs good....two legs better! - JG A - 12/2 11:56:40
     lol(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 12/2 12:31:57
          It is pretty funny when you can see reality - JG A - 12/2 12:33:22
               your meltdown over Trump is hilarious in that is was so - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 12/2 12:43:51
                    Please point out this meltdown? Specifically? - JG A - 12/2 12:57:26
                         just start scrolling down lol - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 12/2 12:59:22
     Look, I know you've fallen in love with the 'no jobs - 90Tiger MU - 12/2 12:06:23
          He is the problem. Tax cuts are great, but should be across - TigerMatt STL - 12/2 12:22:23
               Where is that job loss shifted to? States have been - 90Tiger MU - 12/2 12:27:11
                    That is the problem. You can't directly see it. That $7mil - TigerMatt STL - 12/2 12:33:24
                         What's the loss in state revenue from 1400 jobs lost? all - 90Tiger MU - 12/2 12:35:01
                              Yes the larger economic picture should be taken into - TigerMatt STL - 12/2 12:46:16
                                   I would think so, yes, hence why trump is proposing it at - 90Tiger MU - 12/2 12:50:38
                                        $700K/yr is peanuts to Carrier next to $9.5 billion in UTX - TigerMatt STL - 12/2 13:03:11
                                             i hope it was. You think CEO's everywhere across the US - 90Tiger MU - 12/2 13:04:55
                                                  Seems odd Trump would fvck with his own kind(nm) - DevilsAdvocate MU - 12/2 13:06:04
                                                       He's been ****ing with other CEOs and people in - 90Tiger MU - 12/2 13:08:37
                                             I believe we get fvcked on government contracts - DevilsAdvocate MU - 12/2 13:04:32
                                        I cannot say if it was good or not for Indiana - DevilsAdvocate MU - 12/2 12:51:29
                                             hence why you and i agree someone ran the numbers - - 90Tiger MU - 12/2 12:52:36
               It is inequitable to the tax payer (nm) - DevilsAdvocate MU - 12/2 12:24:13
                    RE: It is inequitable to the tax payer (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 12/2 12:28:14
                         I don't agree with that policy. States like MO and KANSASS - DevilsAdvocate MU - 12/2 12:30:31
                              losing what? how does Missouri or kansASS lose by Indiana - 90Tiger MU - 12/2 12:36:45
                                   I am using that as an example. - DevilsAdvocate MU - 12/2 12:37:44
                                        Well, if states don't "win" by having companies and employee - 90Tiger MU - 12/2 12:40:41
                                             I don't want to pay a subsidy for the corporations whose - DevilsAdvocate MU - 12/2 12:42:42
                                                  This is a totally different discussion then. Reducing - 90Tiger MU - 12/2 12:47:59
                    And it is inequitable to other places where the POTUS-elect - MrBlueSky MU - 12/2 12:25:33
                         RE: And it is inequitable to other places where the POTUS-elect - 90Tiger MU - 12/2 12:28:03
                              Do you think Trump will be involved in all negotiations - MrBlueSky MU - 12/2 12:30:10
                                   I doubt it, but it sure is a loud, shining example to all - 90Tiger MU - 12/2 12:33:27
          Jobs weren't saved - pickle MU - 12/2 12:21:53
               It all depends on one's perspective and context, pickle. - 90Tiger MU - 12/2 12:30:23
               How so?(nm) - DevilsAdvocate MU - 12/2 12:23:25
          Its 3 card monte -which you easily fall for - JG A - 12/2 12:17:20
               One company two plants correct? - DevilsAdvocate MU - 12/2 12:27:37
                    No, one parent company, 2 separate companies under - 90Tiger MU - 12/2 12:37:37
                         We are on the same page there(nm) - DevilsAdvocate MU - 12/2 12:38:07
                              JG's only mistake (lie) was assuming only 1300 (1400 really) - 90Tiger MU - 12/2 12:41:54
                                   You're still missing my point - JG A - 12/2 12:58:08
                                        JG I am missing your point as well. - DevilsAdvocate MU - 12/2 13:01:41
                    Correct that is incorrect - JG A - 12/2 12:31:59
                         Why am hearing the 2100 number thrown around then?(nm) - DevilsAdvocate MU - 12/2 12:33:41
                              Because its after Thursday? - JG A - 12/2 12:35:14
                                   Because JG misunderstood that the 700 jobs still being - 90Tiger MU - 12/2 12:43:25
                                   Isn't that because we are talking about the parent company - DevilsAdvocate MU - 12/2 12:36:32
                                        "we" have only been discussing Carrier, but "JG" didn't - 90Tiger MU - 12/2 13:01:43
               False: 2100 jobs were moving. 700 are still moving - 90Tiger MU - 12/2 12:18:48
                    None of the articles previously said 2100 - JG A - 12/2 12:28:48
                         Again, your ignorace is noted and blamed on those - 90Tiger MU - 12/2 12:53:40
                              You keep doubling down on your dishonesty - JG A - 12/2 13:00:14
          Isn't Carrier a subsidiary of UTX? - DevilsAdvocate MU - 12/2 12:13:42
               Yes. 2100 jobs were planned to move. 1400 from carrier and - 90Tiger MU - 12/2 12:17:13
                    Exactly my point - JG A - 12/2 12:25:40
                         Well then I'll blame your media access for your ignorance - 90Tiger MU - 12/2 12:29:14
                              You blame me for the medias (at best) inaccurate reporting - JG A - 12/2 12:32:50
                                   Example of even when you are wrong, untruthful and an - 90Tiger MU - 12/2 12:38:10
                                        Reread my opening post. Try to find what words you - JG A - 12/2 12:59:20
                         From the one Carrier plant. Those were indeed saved(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 12/2 12:29:01
               yes it is - JG A - 12/2 12:14:51
                    I am assuming, which is probably a bad idea when discussing - DevilsAdvocate MU - 12/2 12:18:38
                         probably a good assumption but nevertheless, JG is - 90Tiger MU - 12/2 12:20:03
                              None of the articles previously said 2100 - JG A - 12/2 12:26:43
                                   Well good for fvcking you for being ignorant, JG. (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 12/2 12:28:36
                                        Exactly my poiont 4 legs good 2 legs better - JG A - 12/2 12:29:32
                              I would sure as hell hope it is a good assumption BUT - DevilsAdvocate MU - 12/2 12:22:16
                    you should read more closely before posting untruths - 90Tiger MU - 12/2 12:17:46
                         LOL no YOU should - JG A - 12/2 12:36:51
                         Please correct me if I am wrong here, but if Carrier - DevilsAdvocate MU - 12/2 12:20:49
                              The plant in Indy was closing and those opps were moving - hefeweizen MU - 12/2 12:24:17
                                   Expanding by losing 600 jobs- check - JG A - 12/2 12:34:34
                                        Yes, GD you are needy today(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 12/2 12:36:43
                                             lmao(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU - 12/2 12:50:15




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard