Welcome Guest

I don't want to pay a subsidy for the corporations whose

Posted on: December 2, 2016 at 12:42:42 CT

DevilsAdvocate KC

Posts:

85470

Member For:

24.04 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

CEOs are way overpaid 90. If the corporations had their way I would. I pay way too much in taxes as it is to support the welfare state.

I don't want to get ****ed from both sides.

Make sense?

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Four legs good....two legs better! - JG A - 12/2 11:56:40

lol(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 12/2 12:31:57

It is pretty funny when you can see reality - JG A - 12/2 12:33:22

your meltdown over Trump is hilarious in that is was so - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 12/2 12:43:51

Please point out this meltdown? Specifically? - JG A - 12/2 12:57:26

just start scrolling down lol - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 12/2 12:59:22

Look, I know you've fallen in love with the 'no jobs - 90Tiger MU - 12/2 12:06:23

He is the problem. Tax cuts are great, but should be across - TigerMatt STL - 12/2 12:22:23

Where is that job loss shifted to? States have been - 90Tiger MU - 12/2 12:27:11

That is the problem. You can't directly see it. That $7mil - TigerMatt STL - 12/2 12:33:24

What's the loss in state revenue from 1400 jobs lost? all - 90Tiger MU - 12/2 12:35:01

Yes the larger economic picture should be taken into - TigerMatt STL - 12/2 12:46:16

I would think so, yes, hence why trump is proposing it at - 90Tiger MU - 12/2 12:50:38

$700K/yr is peanuts to Carrier next to $9.5 billion in UTX - TigerMatt STL - 12/2 13:03:11

i hope it was. You think CEO's everywhere across the US - 90Tiger MU - 12/2 13:04:55

Seems odd Trump would fvck with his own kind(nm) - DevilsAdvocate MU - 12/2 13:06:04

He's been ****ing with other CEOs and people in - 90Tiger MU - 12/2 13:08:37

I believe we get fvcked on government contracts - DevilsAdvocate MU - 12/2 13:04:32

I cannot say if it was good or not for Indiana - DevilsAdvocate MU - 12/2 12:51:29

hence why you and i agree someone ran the numbers - - 90Tiger MU - 12/2 12:52:36

It is inequitable to the tax payer (nm) - DevilsAdvocate MU - 12/2 12:24:13

RE: It is inequitable to the tax payer (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 12/2 12:28:14

I don't agree with that policy. States like MO and KANSASS - DevilsAdvocate MU - 12/2 12:30:31

losing what? how does Missouri or kansASS lose by Indiana - 90Tiger MU - 12/2 12:36:45

I am using that as an example. - DevilsAdvocate MU - 12/2 12:37:44

Well, if states don't "win" by having companies and employee - 90Tiger MU - 12/2 12:40:41

I don't want to pay a subsidy for the corporations whose - DevilsAdvocate MU - 12/2 12:42:42

This is a totally different discussion then. Reducing - 90Tiger MU - 12/2 12:47:59

And it is inequitable to other places where the POTUS-elect - MrBlueSky MU - 12/2 12:25:33

RE: And it is inequitable to other places where the POTUS-elect - 90Tiger MU - 12/2 12:28:03

Do you think Trump will be involved in all negotiations - MrBlueSky MU - 12/2 12:30:10

I doubt it, but it sure is a loud, shining example to all - 90Tiger MU - 12/2 12:33:27

Jobs weren't saved - pickle MU

- 12/2 12:21:53

It all depends on one's perspective and context, pickle. - 90Tiger MU - 12/2 12:30:23

How so?(nm) - DevilsAdvocate MU - 12/2 12:23:25

Its 3 card monte -which you easily fall for - JG A - 12/2 12:17:20

One company two plants correct? - DevilsAdvocate MU - 12/2 12:27:37

No, one parent company, 2 separate companies under - 90Tiger MU - 12/2 12:37:37

We are on the same page there(nm) - DevilsAdvocate MU - 12/2 12:38:07

JG's only mistake (lie) was assuming only 1300 (1400 really) - 90Tiger MU - 12/2 12:41:54

You're still missing my point - JG A - 12/2 12:58:08

JG I am missing your point as well. - DevilsAdvocate MU - 12/2 13:01:41

Correct that is incorrect - JG A - 12/2 12:31:59

Why am hearing the 2100 number thrown around then?(nm) - DevilsAdvocate MU - 12/2 12:33:41

Because its after Thursday? - JG A - 12/2 12:35:14

Because JG misunderstood that the 700 jobs still being - 90Tiger MU - 12/2 12:43:25

Isn't that because we are talking about the parent company - DevilsAdvocate MU - 12/2 12:36:32

"we" have only been discussing Carrier, but "JG" didn't - 90Tiger MU - 12/2 13:01:43

False: 2100 jobs were moving. 700 are still moving - 90Tiger MU - 12/2 12:18:48

None of the articles previously said 2100 - JG A - 12/2 12:28:48

Again, your ignorace is noted and blamed on those - 90Tiger MU - 12/2 12:53:40

You keep doubling down on your dishonesty - JG A - 12/2 13:00:14

Isn't Carrier a subsidiary of UTX? - DevilsAdvocate MU - 12/2 12:13:42

Yes. 2100 jobs were planned to move. 1400 from carrier and - 90Tiger MU - 12/2 12:17:13

Exactly my point - JG A - 12/2 12:25:40

Well then I'll blame your media access for your ignorance - 90Tiger MU - 12/2 12:29:14

You blame me for the medias (at best) inaccurate reporting - JG A - 12/2 12:32:50

Example of even when you are wrong, untruthful and an - 90Tiger MU - 12/2 12:38:10

Reread my opening post. Try to find what words you - JG A - 12/2 12:59:20

From the one Carrier plant. Those were indeed saved(nm) - hefeweizen MU

- 12/2 12:29:01

yes it is - JG A - 12/2 12:14:51

I am assuming, which is probably a bad idea when discussing - DevilsAdvocate MU - 12/2 12:18:38

probably a good assumption but nevertheless, JG is - 90Tiger MU - 12/2 12:20:03

None of the articles previously said 2100 - JG A - 12/2 12:26:43

Well good for fvcking you for being ignorant, JG. (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 12/2 12:28:36

Exactly my poiont 4 legs good 2 legs better - JG A - 12/2 12:29:32

I would sure as hell hope it is a good assumption BUT - DevilsAdvocate MU - 12/2 12:22:16

you should read more closely before posting untruths - 90Tiger MU - 12/2 12:17:46

LOL no YOU should - JG A - 12/2 12:36:51

Please correct me if I am wrong here, but if Carrier - DevilsAdvocate MU - 12/2 12:20:49

The plant in Indy was closing and those opps were moving - hefeweizen MU

- 12/2 12:24:17

Expanding by losing 600 jobs- check - JG A - 12/2 12:34:34

Yes, GD you are needy today(nm) - hefeweizen MU

- 12/2 12:36:43

lmao(nm) - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 12/2 12:50:15