 |
|
True. Any global change would require constitutional action
Posted on: November 10, 2016 at 12:18:42 CT
DHighlander NWMSU
Posts:
50608
Member For:
16.68 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Any state that wishes to go to proportional allocation can do so if they wish. But if others states do not follow suit is just diminishes their electoral power.
The current system 'disenfranchises' red voters in blue states and vice versa. If you go to proportional allocation there will still be red voters in blue districts who feel their vote does not count.
A democratic vote eliminates this problem but then basically leaves the decision to the population centers along the coast. And 2/3 of the states would have to approve before this could be done. Why would Kansas ever agree to this?
The current system 'disenfranchises' red voters in blue states and vice versa. If you go to proportional allocation there will still be red voters in blue districts who feel their vote does not count.
A democratic vote eliminates this problem but then basically leaves the decision to the population centers along the coast. And 2/3 of the states would have to approve before this could be done. Why would Kansas ever agree to this?
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
- 
True. Any global change would require constitutional action - DHighlander KC - 11/10 12:18:42