And I used to have to opine on various post game observations and macro level trends. I was simply dumbfounded by his regression and approach on a game in and game out basis that year. That would be kind of amusing to go back and listen to some of them if Nick still has them.
Here is a post from back then making the argument he was potentially the least efficient player with a major role in program history:
http://tigerboard.com/boards/view.php?message=8358111
And that doesn't even take into account how atrocious he was defensively. Best thing that ever happened to his career was Bowers getting injured, Haith being hired, and him moving to play out of position. All of his weaknesses were mitigated and he could exploit his strengths via mismatches. To some degree, that post almost predicts that outcome.
Edited by FIJItiger at 16:28:19 on 10/05/16