I don't think the SEC contributed to our troubles.
Posted on: September 13, 2016 at 12:36:56 CT
mizzoudiehard MU
Posts:
9129
Member For:
18.34 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
It's just been the perfect storm of problems.
Haith, while deserving credit for a brilliant 2011-12 regular season, was not the right coach to lead the program into a new conference. We entered the SEC in the immediate aftermath of losing to Norfolk State. From there, Haith's teams perpetually underachieved over the first two SEC seasons, despite having multiple pros on the rosters. Then the NCAA investigation came. Then Haith left. Then we hired Kim Anderson, who had to inherit a shattered foundation of a program built previously on transfers. Anderson (who I 100-percent support, just FYI) wasn't able to mesh with the freshmen Haith's staff recruited, and even some of the players recruited by his own staff have bolted for other programs. So you're left with disappointment: four seasons in the SEC and nothing to show for it.
But my hope is that Anderson's third year results in some serious progress. There's an opportunity to do it, since the SEC is once again a weak league with room for growth.
I have to say, though, I really miss Big 12 basketball. I understand the university absolutely had to accept the SEC's invitation -- they'd be crazy not to -- and it's such an unbelievable step up for football and many other athletic programs. But, from a strictly men's basketball perspective, I wasn't very excited about the SEC. Outside of Kentucky, basketball isn't a priority in this league and it never will be. I'm not accusing SEC schools of not caring about basketball at all, because if you ever see a great home crowd at a place like Florida or Arkansas you'll know that's not the case. But basketball is such a distant priority compared to football, much more distant than other leagues. And considering Missouri has been traditionally very much a basketball school, it's disappointing to be a in a league that cares first and foremost about football and then views basketball as a sport to pass the time in the winter.
If men's basketball was the only consideration (and obviously, it's not, nor should it be), I would have had so much fun following Mizzou in the Big Ten. I know that's probably an unpopular statement, but I'd so much rather play a February road game at Purdue or Iowa than at Ole Miss.