Welcome Guest

Some clarification, for those interested

Posted on: August 19, 2016 at 11:58:09 CT
FIJItiger MU
Posts:
146044
Member For:
22.17 yrs
Level:
Moderator
M.O.B. Votes:
0
"Why the APR plunge for the 2013-14 Mizzou team? Seven scholarship players from that roster left the program before their eligibility expired. If they left in poor academic standing, that would further damage the team’s APR. Those players were Jabari Brown, Jordan Clarkson, Shane Rector, Torren Jones, Zach Price, Stefan Jankovic and Cameron Biedscheid."

http://www.stltoday.com/sports/college/mizzou/mizzou-basketball-apr-tumbles/article_330b92fa-39bc-5a05-b23f-abf191b354cf.html

Two of which, Price and Biedschied, never played for MU.

The timing of Clark leaving impacts when his effect is reported, i.e. not yet included in our current numbers. He can't be at MU for 5+ semesters and not be ever factored in.

In regards to Clark and Allen's GPA, that will be irrelevant if they don't enroll somewhere at a 4 year University before the start of next semester:

http://fs.ncaa.org/Docs/Misc_Committees_DB/CAP/APR%20Adjustments/APR%20Transfer%20Adjustment%20Question%20and%20Answer%20Document.pdf

The NCAA Division I Committee on Academic Performance has approved an automatic adjustment to the calculation of the NCAA Division I Academic Progress Rate (APR) to discount the lost retention point in those instances when a student-athlete transfers. Requests for transfer student-athletes who meet all criteria for the automatic adjustment of the retention point.

Review of such an adjustment request is dependent on a student-athlete meeting the following criteria:

1. The student-athlete transferred immediately to another four-year institution (i.e., the next
available regular academic term), which must be supported by documentation of the student-athlete's full-time enrollment and matriculation at the second institution in the next regular academic term;

2. The student-athlete attended the original institution for a minimum of one academic year prior to the transfer;

3. The student-athlete earned the eligibility point in the last term of enrollment prior to the transfer; and

4. The student-athlete presented a cumulative grade-point average of 2.6 or higher at the time of transfer from the original institution.

Adjustment requests that fail to meet the criteria outlined above, specifically the required cumulative grade-point average of at least 2.6, may also be made by member institutions and considered by the NCAA staff, provided the following minimum criteria are met:

1. The student-athlete transferred immediately to another four-year institution (i.e., the next available regular academic term), which must be supported by documentation of the student-athlete's full-time enrollment at the second institution in the next regular academic term;

2. The student-athlete attended the original institution for a minimum of one academic year
prior to the transfer;

3. The student-athlete earned the eligibility point in the last term of enrollment prior to the transfer; and

4. The student-athlete presents a cumulative grade-point average at the original institution of at least 2.0 and satisfies a rigorous review of academic factors.

Question: When a student-athlete transfers from our institution, does the student-athlete need to be enrolled immediately in the next regular academic term as a full-time student?

Answer: Yes, documentation would need to be obtained in order to verify that the student-athlete immediately

Question: Is any relief provided for the lost retention point if the student-athlete immediately transfers to a two-year institution instead of a four-year institution?

Answer: No, the student-athlete must immediately enroll full time at a four-year institution

Question: What if a student-athlete is a 2-4 transfer and has only been at our institution for one term but was enrolled at the two-year institution for one year? Does he or she qualify for the automatic adjustment of the retention point, provided he or she meets all of the other criteria?

Answer: Such a student-athlete would not qualify for the automatic adjustment for the student-athlete must have attended your institution for a minimum of one academic year prior to the transfer. In this instance, the student-athlete only attended your institution for one term and thus, would not qualify for the automatic adjustment of the lost retention point.

Question: What does it mean to transfer "immediately to another four-year institution?"

Answer: Such a student-athlete must enroll full time at another four-year institution in the next available regular academic term.

Edited by FIJItiger at 12:00:32 on 08/19/16
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

     Of course it is. We do not currently have penalties, but - FIJItiger MU - 8/19 10:56:42
          You aren't trying to do math again are you? - bornoncampus MU - 8/19 14:30:37
     can you share the links / data to MU's APR situation in - 90Tiger MU - 8/19 10:55:50
          Doesn't it just come down to Wes Clark and Allen finding - StaleyTiger MU - 8/19 11:15:18
               That is the main outstanding issue at this point. - zodiac6 JC - 8/19 12:34:01
               Not necessarily - haeffb MU - 8/19 11:47:05
                    Some clarification, for those interested - FIJItiger MU - 8/19 11:58:09
                         One thing you've consistently missed - haeffb MU - 8/19 13:22:44
                              MU will not have an APR problem. Fiji likes to post the - UMR85 MU - 8/19 14:25:04
                                   He's not entirely wrong. - zodiac6 JC - 8/19 14:27:32
                                        May not be entirely wrong in this specific instance - haeffb MU - 8/19 14:47:49
                              Can't find the confirmation, but pretty sure Payne - FIJItiger MU - 8/19 13:25:38
                                   So you don't know if he remained at Mizzou - haeffb MU - 8/19 13:29:49
                                        No. I know he remained at MU and I know his scholarship is - FIJItiger MU - 8/19 13:33:50
                                             You know he remained but don't know if he stuck around? - haeffb MU - 8/19 13:36:19
                                                  RE: You know he remained but don't know if he stuck around? - FIJItiger MU - 8/19 13:39:09
                         your proved numerous times that you are clueless about this - Moball2play SWT - 8/19 12:10:53
                              The subject heading clearly indicated the content was - FIJItiger MU - 8/19 12:14:29
                                   You're confusing clarification with obfuscation. - zodiac6 JC - 8/19 12:32:55
                                        But either way he didn't stay in school at MU (nm) - FIJItiger MU - 8/19 13:23:50
                                             Yes. We know that. - zodiac6 JC - 8/19 14:12:27
                                                  You assume a competence for a lot of posters that - FIJItiger MU - 8/19 15:12:23
                                                       You're assuming a level of incompetence I've never seen. - zodiac6 JC - 8/19 16:55:11
                                   you're clarifications are wrong though...so... - Moball2play SWT - 8/19 12:17:42
                                        lol, poor Moball is mad (nm) - 90Tiger MU - 8/19 12:28:51
                                             says the dude that google chrome blocks people hahaha(nm) - MidMoBaller4Life MU - 8/19 12:29:22
                                                  He isn't mad, he is sad - Mr. Orange SU - 8/20 11:43:43
                                        Well 2 of the 3 are cited, but I do admit the other requires - FIJItiger MU - 8/19 12:18:49
                    So the APR issue isn't a non-issue, it's fair to say it's - 90Tiger MU - 8/19 11:50:41
                         APR is constantly an issue - haeffb MU - 8/19 13:31:03
               let haeffb and UMR85 tell you - they say it's settled - 90Tiger MU - 8/19 11:37:55
                    Don't believe that accurately represents my position - haeffb MU - 8/19 11:48:30
               Both of them are now parents, I don't believe they are - FIJItiger MU - 8/19 11:16:07
                    They sure as heck shouldn't be relying on their parenting - Uncle John MU - 8/19 11:22:28
                         That seems like a rather uninformed judgement (nm) - FIJItiger MU - 8/19 11:23:03
                              That's Uncle John for you. Didn't you know that every - StaleyTiger MU - 8/19 11:26:12
                                   This seems like a more applicable source - FIJItiger MU - 8/19 11:29:57
                                   Who said anything about thugs. Is that what you are calling - Uncle John MU - 8/19 11:27:52
                                        RE: Who said anything about thugs. Is that what you are calling - StaleyTiger MU - 8/19 11:29:09
                                             RE: Who said anything about thugs. Is that what you are calling - Uncle John MU - 8/19 11:34:05
                                                  Thug lives matter(nm) - MidMoBaller4Life MU - 8/19 11:37:11
                    I know people like to give you **** about all your APR - StaleyTiger MU - 8/19 11:18:56
                         There's ways around it.(nm) - Uncle John MU - 8/19 11:23:08
                         Mathematically, pretty much. Its a weird metric that is - FIJItiger MU - 8/19 11:22:06
          Please be quiet Ms. Lochte(nm) - MidMoBaller4Life MU - 8/19 10:56:30
     the next time fiji is right about APR - SuperTone MU - 8/19 10:42:14




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard