Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

"has to accept" does not mean "is required to accept"

Posted on: September 5, 2024 at 15:23:00 CT
Spanky KU
Posts:
146380
Member For:
21.01 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
5
It means the judge is the only person that is required to accept the plea and that the prosecutor merely can make his opinion known, but the sole decision maker is the judge, regardless of what the prosecutor recommends.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Hunter finally faces the music - Ace AU - 9/5 13:35:55
     He has to plead guilty before the election otherwise dad - MU-TULSA MU - 9/5 14:46:27
          Dad can pardon him before a conviction. See Carter pardoning - Spanky KU - 9/5 15:28:02
     What about "the big guy" though? - AWOLTiger KC - 9/5 14:20:59
     you think your Pack has a chance vs. UT this weekend?(nm) - Fire Marshall Bill MU - 9/5 14:16:55
     an Alford plea is not unusual(nm) - Spanky KU - 9/5 14:10:35
          Weiss still has to accept it. He will and all of this goes - hefeweizen MU - 9/5 14:11:33
               the judge has to accept it, not the prosecutor(nm) - Spanky KU - 9/5 14:22:52
                    "has to accept" does not mean "is required to accept" - Spanky KU - 9/5 15:23:00
                    aren't these fed charges? DOJ will have to sign off. - 90Tiger STL - 9/5 14:39:50
                         No.. only the judge has to sign off: - Spanky KU - 9/5 14:49:20
                              read - 90Tiger STL - 9/5 14:55:46
                                   "should not"... your highlighting is off: - Spanky KU - 9/5 14:59:22
                                        "does not prohibit"..."whenn there is a strong factual - 90Tiger STL - 9/5 15:00:59
                                             and their approval is not required for the judge to accept - Spanky KU - 9/5 15:13:44
                                             No... "The Court reasoned that there is no material - Spanky KU - 9/5 15:03:07
                                                  You should tell Scarsi that(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 9/5 15:03:31
                                                       You don't too goodly read - Spanky KU - 9/5 15:05:36
                                                            no contest =/= alford plea jfc, spanky (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 9/5 15:40:36
                                                                 An Alford plea and a No Contest plea are both - Spanky KU - 9/5 15:49:07
                                                                      they aren't the same, agreed (nm) - 90Tiger STL - 9/5 19:00:00
                              I'm guessing that's from an article you didn't link? I - 90Tiger STL - 9/5 14:52:04
                                   RE: I'm guessing that's from an article you didn't link? I - Spanky KU - 9/5 14:56:30
                                        um, ""Scarsi does not believe he could be compelled into - hefeweizen MU - 9/5 14:58:31
                                             Scarsi is the judge... the only person who can accept or - Spanky KU - 9/5 15:00:39
                                                  the DOJ will take this up if the judge accepts this - 90Tiger STL - 9/5 15:01:48
                                                       Pleading "No Contest" is not a rediculous plea - Spanky KU - 9/5 15:07:50
                                                  Dude, read. I even quoted Scarsi. (nm) - hefeweizen MU - 9/5 15:01:39
                                                       Re-read my post "only the judge has to sign off" - Spanky KU - 9/5 15:05:00
                                                            Scarsi: I dont believe I can be compelled to accept the plea - hefeweizen MU - 9/5 15:06:28
                                                                 The judge can reject the plea. The judge can accept the plea - Spanky KU - 9/5 15:20:41
                                        none of that offers any validation of the key question I - 90Tiger STL - 9/5 14:57:48
                                             See Alford v NC. Hunter does not need "strong evidence to - Spanky KU - 9/5 15:53:20
                         spank'd again(nm) - hefeweizen MU - 9/5 14:43:12
                              Nope.. I am correct. The prosecutor's acceptance is not - Spanky KU - 9/5 14:53:21
                                   it isn't the prosecutor we're talking about - it's the DOJ - 90Tiger STL - 9/5 14:59:48
                                        The prosecutor is DOJ The judge doesn't need DOJ/prosecutor - Spanky KU - 9/5 15:33:27
     ^ ignorant partisan take. why can't you think rationally - 90Tiger STL - 9/5 13:59:01
     The Dem party is behind this. They don’t want all the - Outsider MU - 9/5 13:51:13
          No further dive into any other business dealings either - Fred G. Sanford USA - 9/5 13:56:05
          well yeah. Very smart move. Pretty sure the evidence - hefeweizen MU - 9/5 13:52:12
     Where did you practice law----??????? - mu7176grad MU - 9/5 13:48:08
     DOC, you may deserve credit for this post - MIZ45 MU - 9/5 13:48:02
     The West Memphis 3 used the Alford Plea(nm) - tigerNkc KC - 9/5 13:47:47
     Ever heard of a pardon you f ucking idiot...nm - tigertix MU - 9/5 13:40:27
          RE: Ever heard of a pardon you f ucking idiot...nm - MOCO SON MU - 9/5 13:46:32




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard