pickle.
For now, let's just try and discuss the most recent example and my characterization of your post:
“Yesterday he reiterated a recurring belief that killing police who pull one over is justified as self-defense.”
In what ways do you think what I wrote there was false in light of what you wrote in response to the news items posted earlier in that thread and Tigrrrr's synopsis:
Tigrrrr!:
bunch of marijuana/synthetics charges.
Driving a car with a 2 year old temp tag that was from an entirely different vehicle.
Ambushing an officer with a 300 Blackout rifle when he walked up to the car and when the rifle jams, clearing the jam to shoot the officer again when he's on the ground.
Because he didn't want to get arrested and have his car towed.
http://tigerboard.com/boards/view.php?message=18219418
pickle: "Another victimless crime resulting in self-defense and the death of the aggressor"