 |
|
It is a response to your assertion that the Supreme Court
Posted on: May 9, 2022 at 19:08:43 CT
JeffB MU
Posts:
73726
Member For:
21.78 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
is "giving the power to the people", as opposed to the people having the right to decide what laws they want for their own states.
The Supreme Court drastically overstepped its authority in abrogating all of the state laws at the time by manufacturing a "right to privacy" that is nowhere in the constitution and is absurd reasoning given the rampant disregard for privacy the federal government exhibits on a routine basis. They record our phone calls, keeping records of all the phone calls in the US, having access to all of our emails and texts and apparently even social media accounts.
All of this to arrive at a supposed "right" to kill one's unborn child at any time for any or no reason... because... privacy?
Of course, there is no right to do what is wrong as I mentioned in my post and which Abraham Lincoln rightly argued in his debates on slavery with Senator Douglas.
Sen. Douglas argued that he was personally opposed to slavery but that neither he nor anyone else had a right to interfere with slave owners' rights to their "property".
In hindsight we can see how reprehensible his pro-choice stance to own slaves as property was. I have no doubt that in the future people will look back with even more disgust at those, such as yourself, who pretend to see a "right" to intentionally, often brutally kill tens of millions of helpless, innocent unborn human beings.
The Supreme Court drastically overstepped its authority in abrogating all of the state laws at the time by manufacturing a "right to privacy" that is nowhere in the constitution and is absurd reasoning given the rampant disregard for privacy the federal government exhibits on a routine basis. They record our phone calls, keeping records of all the phone calls in the US, having access to all of our emails and texts and apparently even social media accounts.
All of this to arrive at a supposed "right" to kill one's unborn child at any time for any or no reason... because... privacy?
Of course, there is no right to do what is wrong as I mentioned in my post and which Abraham Lincoln rightly argued in his debates on slavery with Senator Douglas.
Sen. Douglas argued that he was personally opposed to slavery but that neither he nor anyone else had a right to interfere with slave owners' rights to their "property".
In hindsight we can see how reprehensible his pro-choice stance to own slaves as property was. I have no doubt that in the future people will look back with even more disgust at those, such as yourself, who pretend to see a "right" to intentionally, often brutally kill tens of millions of helpless, innocent unborn human beings.
Please explain why this message is being reported.
MESSAGE THREAD
It is a response to your assertion that the Supreme Court - JeffB MU - 5/9 19:08:43