Pure sophistry on your part. And disappointing, once
Posted on: December 22, 2021 at 09:23:05 CT
hokie VT
Posts:
64869
Member For:
9.02 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
again.
Yes, I think the government has a responsibility to help and protect its citizens in need. The question gets knotty when the definitions of citizens and, “in need“ are evaluated. There will be judgment calls. That’s true when you deal with humans in an imperfect world.
Only the world you and The Idiot want and demand is perfect.
You just suggested that a person with PTSD suffered due to service to our country be the responsibility of unnamed and unknown generals, unnamed and unknown politicians and others outside of government because you don’t think government has any responsibility for anything at any time, ever.
Those of you who demand 100% purity in your insane idea of abolishing government come up with crap like this sometimes. It’s disappointing.
Someone is suffering from PTSD and is about to jump off a building or a ship into the ocean. You think the generals who sent him to war should be held responsible at this particular moment. At this deciding time in this man’s life, they have to find the general responsible for sending him to war. How about the Colonels the majors the captains the lieutenants do they all have personal responsibility as well? Should they be contacted and asked to pay ?
Sophistry and ideological purity make smart people look stupid.