No, I'm not suggesting that all, because that would imply
Posted on: December 22, 2021 at 09:03:16 CT
ummmm MU
Posts:
44901
Member For:
12.82 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
that the govt had a duty in the first instance.
Is it your position that under no circumstances should any government agency spend government funds to lift a finger to help, protect or save the life of someone experiencing a severe mental breakdown?
Yes.
Just let them kill themselves, let them die…?
No, of course not. You act like nothing can happen unless a govt acts.
Should someone who served his country in war and is suffering mentally, either from a bullet wound in the brain or psychological wounds from the experience He ignored and cast to side by any and all government agencies?
The individuals (politicians, generals, etc.) that sent that individual into war should be held accountable to those that they caused to be injured, not third parties.