Welcome
Guest
Sign In
|
Register
BASKETBALL
FOOTBALL
ALL SPORTS
THE SHACK
TICKETS
POKER
POLITICS
WALL ST.
HELP / TESTING
ABOUT US
Bring clarity to them by making more rules, right?
Posted on: March 3, 2021 at 13:42:31 CT
ummmm
MU
Posts:
44832
Member For:
12.67 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
Otherwise, what is the point in retelling the same rules in different language?
Please explain why this message is being reported.
Reason For Report:
REPLY
Handle:
Password:
Subject:
MESSAGE THREAD
This needs to be repeated often:
-
Spanky
KU
-
3/3 11:33:48
As a reminder of judicial activism and overreach, yes (nm)
-
pickle
MU
-
3/3 12:36:49
in Supreme Court parliance, a minority opinion
-
Ace
AU
-
3/3 12:31:49
So what if he’s a minority?(nm)
-
El-ahrairah
BAMA
-
3/3 12:33:20
his is an opinion that has zero impact on the decision
-
Ace
AU
-
3/3 12:41:21
RE: This needs to be repeated often:
-
MUTGR
MU
-
3/3 12:29:29
Every election is stolen, every voter a fraud
-
El-ahrairah
BAMA
-
3/3 12:06:52
Serious question; how much of a role does the chief justice
-
hokie
VT
-
3/3 11:56:07
I believe each justice is assigned to a circuit
-
meatiger
MU
-
3/3 12:02:30
If thomas could have brought that to SCOTUS, seems like
-
hokie
VT
-
3/3 12:47:04
In this case, I believe they voted on standing
-
meatiger
MU
-
3/3 13:04:24
the fact you think you should be ****ed off at all
-
ashtray
UF
-
3/3 12:48:25
According to my limited research it takes 4 justices
-
GA Tiger
MU
-
3/3 12:01:09
this was about standing
-
meatiger
MU
-
3/3 12:03:18
What difference at this point does it make?
-
tigerfans3
MU
-
3/3 11:41:25
Why is it the job of the Court to provide "clear rules"?(nm)
-
meatiger
MU
-
3/3 11:37:56
You can't make it up
-
4TigersinMichigan
MU
-
3/3 11:39:03
The job of the Court is to judge
-
meatiger
MU
-
3/3 11:39:36
And where did Justice Thomas ever say they were to make
-
4TigersinMichigan
MU
-
3/3 11:41:20
Justice Thomas literally said: "provide clear rules" (nm)
-
ummmm
MU
-
3/3 12:34:36
Yes, just as a plow operator provides clear parking lots
-
4TigersinMichigan
MU
-
3/3 12:43:31
That is a bad analogy.
-
ummmm
MU
-
3/3 13:16:28
The rules are there
-
4TigersinMichigan
MU
-
3/3 13:22:45
Bring clarity to them by making more rules, right?
-
ummmm
MU
-
3/3 13:42:31
Their job is to answer the question in light of the US
-
4TigersinMichigan
MU
-
3/3 13:44:58
And in the process of answering those questions
-
ummmm
MU
-
3/3 14:03:19
And the language of his text
-
meatiger
MU
-
3/3 14:13:35
It is not the job of the Court to even provide clarity
-
meatiger
MU
-
3/3 13:25:55
Of course it is their job to provide Constitutional clarity
-
4TigersinMichigan
MU
-
3/3 13:29:11
It is not. Read the constitution (nm)
-
pickle
MU
-
3/3 14:07:33
RE: Of course it is their job to provide Constitutional clarity
-
meatiger
MU
-
3/3 13:31:22
That is the clarity they provide
-
4TigersinMichigan
MU
-
3/3 13:33:30
there was no plaintiff with standing(nm)
-
meatiger
MU
-
3/3 13:37:58
One is a verb
-
meatiger
MU
-
3/3 12:59:52
I guess I should have read your post before typing basically
-
ummmm
MU
-
3/3 13:17:00
That is fine
-
meatiger
MU
-
3/3 13:22:58
When one has a decades long record and has been very
-
4TigersinMichigan
MU
-
3/3 13:24:06
So a very consistent person mis-wrote?(nm)
-
meatiger
MU
-
3/3 13:26:26
No, he was quite clear, quite accurate and quite consistent(nm)
-
4TigersinMichigan
MU
-
3/3 13:30:31
when liberal judges do that you call it judicial activism
-
ashtray
UF
-
3/3 12:47:46
RE: And where did Justice Thomas ever say they were to make
-
meatiger
MU
-
3/3 11:42:37
Providing clarity is not making rules
-
4TigersinMichigan
MU
-
3/3 11:44:35
he did not say provide clarity
-
meatiger
MU
-
3/3 11:46:20
Yes, rules are in place
-
4TigersinMichigan
MU
-
3/3 11:47:59
So why did he not use those words?
-
meatiger
MU
-
3/3 11:50:45
He did use those words
-
4TigersinMichigan
MU
-
3/3 12:23:08
So now you are spinning his words. Lol(nm)
-
meatiger
MU
-
3/3 13:01:40
No, I am interpreting his statement in light of his entire
-
4TigersinMichigan
MU
-
3/3 13:07:08
If he is anything like you
-
meatiger
MU
-
3/3 13:12:14
They do
-
4TigersinMichigan
MU
-
3/3 13:15:16
yet in this case
-
meatiger
MU
-
3/3 13:21:12
RE: This needs to be repeated often:
-
MOCO SON
MU
-
3/3 11:37:15
so does this
-
ashtray
UF
-
3/3 11:34:40
You are wrong
-
BigDave
MU
-
3/3 13:39:05
and when states violate their own laws in a federal
-
Spanky
KU
-
3/3 12:07:06
No (nm)
-
pickle
MU
-
3/3 12:37:30
the state supreme court said they didn't
-
ashtray
UF
-
3/3 12:17:34
and then what is the process?
-
Spanky
KU
-
3/3 12:19:57
the state supreme court is the end of the process (nm)
-
ashtray
UF
-
3/3 12:21:54
False. Try again(nm)
-
Spanky
KU
-
3/3 12:25:27
State supreme court’s interpretation of any state law
-
ashtray
UF
-
3/3 12:27:32
define 'generally'..... last I checked it didn't mean
-
Spanky
KU
-
3/3 12:32:56
good laydown (nm)
-
ashtray
UF
-
3/3 12:44:55
You are the one who backtracked from "the state supreme
-
Spanky
KU
-
3/3 12:54:41
you struggle with basic comprehension whenever you're
-
ashtray
UF
-
3/3 12:57:04
So you think you were correct with this post:
-
Spanky
KU
-
3/3 13:40:45
both of those were 100% correct
-
ashtray
UF
-
3/3 13:50:54
Nope... the 2nd one was MOST correct, but the 1st was very
-
Spanky
KU
-
3/3 14:21:01
incorrect (nm)
-
ashtray
UF
-
3/3 14:35:48
See? You had a chance to show you aren't a dumb@$$
-
Spanky
KU
-
3/3 14:56:19
RE: See? You had a chance to show you aren't a dumb@$$
-
ashtray
UF
-
3/3 16:00:43
You sure are!
-
Spanky
KU
-
3/3 16:25:02
"I know you are but what am I?" (nm)
-
ashtray
UF
-
3/3 18:31:31
The Supreme Court deals with Federal laws(nm)
-
meatiger
MU
-
3/3 12:20:24
Nope. Try again(nm)
-
Spanky
KU
-
3/3 12:24:59
Federal election laws are a state issue?(nm)
-
DHighlander
NWMSU
-
3/3 11:35:33
RE: Federal election laws are a state issue?(nm)
-
ashtray
UF
-
3/3 11:39:37
Some people aren't bright enough to realize that even
-
4TigersinMichigan
MU
-
3/3 11:37:14
And you must bend the Constitution so much
-
meatiger
MU
-
3/3 11:39:13
don't touch the poop, meat (nm)
-
ashtray
UF
-
3/3 11:40:07
I am helping to give you material when
-
meatiger
MU
-
3/3 11:41:47
Like he did yesterday? That's funny. You take his
-
DHighlander
NWMSU
-
3/3 11:44:22
Sit back and soak it in
-
4TigersinMichigan
MU
-
3/3 11:46:13
this is your typical lay down (nm)
-
ashtray
UF
-
3/3 11:47:07
I only pointed out you calling things unconstitutional
-
ashtray
UF
-
3/3 11:45:27
You left out a very important word in my statement. I said
-
DHighlander
NWMSU
-
3/3 12:33:30
the SC judgments
-
meatiger
MU
-
3/3 13:13:06
And? What is it about the process that confuses you?
-
DHighlander
NWMSU
-
3/3 13:27:42
context is where you fail
-
ashtray
UF
-
3/3 12:46:16
Your English was quite clear(nm)
-
meatiger
MU
-
3/3 11:44:58
Yes, it was. Apparently you and a$$hat require an English to
-
DHighlander
NWMSU
-
3/3 12:36:15
now you're projecting again
-
ashtray
UF
-
3/3 12:46:56
He was also looking for COVID-18, 17, and
-
meatiger
MU
-
3/3 13:13:52
You keep repeating that thinking you are making a point.
-
DHighlander
NWMSU
-
3/3 13:11:33
no, I've simply proved that you're as retarded as your
-
ashtray
UF
-
3/3 13:29:30
You keep avoiding the question. Does my claiming it is self
-
DHighlander
NWMSU
-
3/3 14:45:43
no, but you claiming anything is suspect and should be
-
ashtray
UF
-
3/3 15:45:14