Welcome Guest

Sign In | Register

Federal election laws are a state issue?(nm)

Posted on: March 3, 2021 at 11:35:33 CT

DHighlander NWMSU

Posts:

45859

Member For:

15.67 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

0

(nm) means no message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

This needs to be repeated often: - Spanky KU - 3/3 11:33:48

As a reminder of judicial activism and overreach, yes (nm) - pickle MU

- 3/3 12:36:49

in Supreme Court parliance, a minority opinion - Ace A - 3/3 12:31:49

So what if he’s a minority?(nm) - El-ahrairah BAMA - 3/3 12:33:20

his is an opinion that has zero impact on the decision - Ace A - 3/3 12:41:21

RE: This needs to be repeated often: - MUTGR MU - 3/3 12:29:29

Every election is stolen, every voter a fraud - El-ahrairah BAMA - 3/3 12:06:52

Serious question; how much of a role does the chief justice - hokie VT - 3/3 11:56:07

I believe each justice is assigned to a circuit - meatiger MU - 3/3 12:02:30

If thomas could have brought that to SCOTUS, seems like - hokie VT - 3/3 12:47:04

In this case, I believe they voted on standing - meatiger MU - 3/3 13:04:24

the fact you think you should be ****ed off at all - ashtray UF - 3/3 12:48:25

According to my limited research it takes 4 justices - GA Tiger MU - 3/3 12:01:09

this was about standing - meatiger MU - 3/3 12:03:18

What difference at this point does it make? - tigerfans3 MU - 3/3 11:41:25

Why is it the job of the Court to provide "clear rules"?(nm) - meatiger MU - 3/3 11:37:56

You can't make it up - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 3/3 11:39:03

The job of the Court is to judge - meatiger MU - 3/3 11:39:36

And where did Justice Thomas ever say they were to make - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 3/3 11:41:20

Justice Thomas literally said: "provide clear rules" (nm) - ummmm MU - 3/3 12:34:36

Yes, just as a plow operator provides clear parking lots - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 3/3 12:43:31

That is a bad analogy. - ummmm MU - 3/3 13:16:28

The rules are there - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 3/3 13:22:45

Bring clarity to them by making more rules, right? - ummmm MU - 3/3 13:42:31

Their job is to answer the question in light of the US - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 3/3 13:44:58

And in the process of answering those questions - ummmm MU - 3/3 14:03:19

And the language of his text - meatiger MU - 3/3 14:13:35

It is not the job of the Court to even provide clarity - meatiger MU - 3/3 13:25:55

Of course it is their job to provide Constitutional clarity - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 3/3 13:29:11

It is not. Read the constitution (nm) - pickle MU

- 3/3 14:07:33

RE: Of course it is their job to provide Constitutional clarity - meatiger MU - 3/3 13:31:22

That is the clarity they provide - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 3/3 13:33:30

there was no plaintiff with standing(nm) - meatiger MU - 3/3 13:37:58

One is a verb - meatiger MU - 3/3 12:59:52

I guess I should have read your post before typing basically - ummmm MU - 3/3 13:17:00

That is fine - meatiger MU - 3/3 13:22:58

When one has a decades long record and has been very - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 3/3 13:24:06

So a very consistent person mis-wrote?(nm) - meatiger MU - 3/3 13:26:26

No, he was quite clear, quite accurate and quite consistent(nm) - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 3/3 13:30:31

when liberal judges do that you call it judicial activism - ashtray UF - 3/3 12:47:46

RE: And where did Justice Thomas ever say they were to make - meatiger MU - 3/3 11:42:37

Providing clarity is not making rules - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 3/3 11:44:35

he did not say provide clarity - meatiger MU - 3/3 11:46:20

Yes, rules are in place - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 3/3 11:47:59

So why did he not use those words? - meatiger MU - 3/3 11:50:45

He did use those words - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 3/3 12:23:08

So now you are spinning his words. Lol(nm) - meatiger MU - 3/3 13:01:40

No, I am interpreting his statement in light of his entire - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 3/3 13:07:08

If he is anything like you - meatiger MU - 3/3 13:12:14

They do - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 3/3 13:15:16

yet in this case - meatiger MU - 3/3 13:21:12

RE: This needs to be repeated often: - MOCO SON MU - 3/3 11:37:15

so does this - ashtray UF - 3/3 11:34:40

You are wrong - BigDave MU - 3/3 13:39:05

and when states violate their own laws in a federal - Spanky KU - 3/3 12:07:06

No (nm) - pickle MU

- 3/3 12:37:30

the state supreme court said they didn't - ashtray UF - 3/3 12:17:34

and then what is the process? - Spanky KU - 3/3 12:19:57

the state supreme court is the end of the process (nm) - ashtray UF - 3/3 12:21:54

False. Try again(nm) - Spanky KU - 3/3 12:25:27

State supreme court’s interpretation of any state law - ashtray UF - 3/3 12:27:32

define 'generally'..... last I checked it didn't mean - Spanky KU - 3/3 12:32:56

good laydown (nm) - ashtray UF - 3/3 12:44:55

You are the one who backtracked from "the state supreme - Spanky KU - 3/3 12:54:41

you struggle with basic comprehension whenever you're - ashtray UF - 3/3 12:57:04

So you think you were correct with this post: - Spanky KU - 3/3 13:40:45

both of those were 100% correct - ashtray UF - 3/3 13:50:54

Nope... the 2nd one was MOST correct, but the 1st was very - Spanky KU - 3/3 14:21:01

incorrect (nm) - ashtray UF - 3/3 14:35:48

See? You had a chance to show you aren't a dumb@$$ - Spanky KU - 3/3 14:56:19

RE: See? You had a chance to show you aren't a dumb@$$ - ashtray UF - 3/3 16:00:43

You sure are! - Spanky KU - 3/3 16:25:02

"I know you are but what am I?" (nm) - ashtray UF - 3/3 18:31:31

The Supreme Court deals with Federal laws(nm) - meatiger MU - 3/3 12:20:24

Nope. Try again(nm) - Spanky KU - 3/3 12:24:59

Federal election laws are a state issue?(nm) - DHighlander NWMSU - 3/3 11:35:33

RE: Federal election laws are a state issue?(nm) - ashtray UF - 3/3 11:39:37

Some people aren't bright enough to realize that even - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 3/3 11:37:14

And you must bend the Constitution so much - meatiger MU - 3/3 11:39:13

don't touch the poop, meat (nm) - ashtray UF - 3/3 11:40:07

I am helping to give you material when - meatiger MU - 3/3 11:41:47

Like he did yesterday? That's funny. You take his - DHighlander NWMSU - 3/3 11:44:22

Sit back and soak it in - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 3/3 11:46:13

this is your typical lay down (nm) - ashtray UF - 3/3 11:47:07

I only pointed out you calling things unconstitutional - ashtray UF - 3/3 11:45:27

You left out a very important word in my statement. I said - DHighlander NWMSU - 3/3 12:33:30

the SC judgments - meatiger MU - 3/3 13:13:06

And? What is it about the process that confuses you? - DHighlander NWMSU - 3/3 13:27:42

context is where you fail - ashtray UF - 3/3 12:46:16

Your English was quite clear(nm) - meatiger MU - 3/3 11:44:58

Yes, it was. Apparently you and a$$hat require an English to - DHighlander NWMSU - 3/3 12:36:15

now you're projecting again - ashtray UF - 3/3 12:46:56

He was also looking for COVID-18, 17, and - meatiger MU - 3/3 13:13:52

You keep repeating that thinking you are making a point. - DHighlander NWMSU - 3/3 13:11:33

no, I've simply proved that you're as retarded as your - ashtray UF - 3/3 13:29:30

You keep avoiding the question. Does my claiming it is self - DHighlander NWMSU - 3/3 14:45:43

no, but you claiming anything is suspect and should be - ashtray UF - 3/3 15:45:14

©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy About Tigerboard