Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

No, I am interpreting his statement in light of his entire

Posted on: March 3, 2021 at 13:07:08 CT
4TigersinMichigan MU
Posts:
126941
Member For:
22.79 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
10
career and judicial philosophy. Context matters, at least to those intelligent enough to understand context.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

This needs to be repeated often: - Spanky KU - 3/3 11:33:48
     As a reminder of judicial activism and overreach, yes (nm) - pickle MU - 3/3 12:36:49
     in Supreme Court parliance, a minority opinion - Ace AU - 3/3 12:31:49
          So what if he’s a minority?(nm) - El-ahrairah BAMA - 3/3 12:33:20
               his is an opinion that has zero impact on the decision - Ace AU - 3/3 12:41:21
     RE: This needs to be repeated often: - MUTGR MU - 3/3 12:29:29
     Every election is stolen, every voter a fraud - El-ahrairah BAMA - 3/3 12:06:52
     Serious question; how much of a role does the chief justice - hokie VT - 3/3 11:56:07
          I believe each justice is assigned to a circuit - meatiger MU - 3/3 12:02:30
               If thomas could have brought that to SCOTUS, seems like - hokie VT - 3/3 12:47:04
                    In this case, I believe they voted on standing - meatiger MU - 3/3 13:04:24
                    the fact you think you should be ****ed off at all - ashtray UF - 3/3 12:48:25
          According to my limited research it takes 4 justices - GA Tiger MU - 3/3 12:01:09
               this was about standing - meatiger MU - 3/3 12:03:18
     What difference at this point does it make? - tigerfans3 MU - 3/3 11:41:25
     Why is it the job of the Court to provide "clear rules"?(nm) - meatiger MU - 3/3 11:37:56
          You can't make it up - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 3/3 11:39:03
               The job of the Court is to judge - meatiger MU - 3/3 11:39:36
                    And where did Justice Thomas ever say they were to make - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 3/3 11:41:20
                         Justice Thomas literally said: "provide clear rules" (nm) - ummmm MU - 3/3 12:34:36
                              Yes, just as a plow operator provides clear parking lots - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 3/3 12:43:31
                                   That is a bad analogy. - ummmm MU - 3/3 13:16:28
                                        The rules are there - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 3/3 13:22:45
                                             Bring clarity to them by making more rules, right? - ummmm MU - 3/3 13:42:31
                                                  Their job is to answer the question in light of the US - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 3/3 13:44:58
                                                       And in the process of answering those questions - ummmm MU - 3/3 14:03:19
                                                            And the language of his text - meatiger MU - 3/3 14:13:35
                                             It is not the job of the Court to even provide clarity - meatiger MU - 3/3 13:25:55
                                                  Of course it is their job to provide Constitutional clarity - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 3/3 13:29:11
                                                       It is not. Read the constitution (nm) - pickle MU - 3/3 14:07:33
                                                       RE: Of course it is their job to provide Constitutional clarity - meatiger MU - 3/3 13:31:22
                                                            That is the clarity they provide - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 3/3 13:33:30
                                                                 there was no plaintiff with standing(nm) - meatiger MU - 3/3 13:37:58
                                   One is a verb - meatiger MU - 3/3 12:59:52
                                        I guess I should have read your post before typing basically - ummmm MU - 3/3 13:17:00
                                             That is fine - meatiger MU - 3/3 13:22:58
                                                  When one has a decades long record and has been very - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 3/3 13:24:06
                                                       So a very consistent person mis-wrote?(nm) - meatiger MU - 3/3 13:26:26
                                                            No, he was quite clear, quite accurate and quite consistent(nm) - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 3/3 13:30:31
                                   when liberal judges do that you call it judicial activism - ashtray UF - 3/3 12:47:46
                         RE: And where did Justice Thomas ever say they were to make - meatiger MU - 3/3 11:42:37
                              Providing clarity is not making rules - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 3/3 11:44:35
                                   he did not say provide clarity - meatiger MU - 3/3 11:46:20
                                        Yes, rules are in place - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 3/3 11:47:59
                                             So why did he not use those words? - meatiger MU - 3/3 11:50:45
                                                  He did use those words - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 3/3 12:23:08
                                                       So now you are spinning his words. Lol(nm) - meatiger MU - 3/3 13:01:40
                                                            No, I am interpreting his statement in light of his entire - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 3/3 13:07:08
                                                                 If he is anything like you - meatiger MU - 3/3 13:12:14
                                                                      They do - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 3/3 13:15:16
                                                                           yet in this case - meatiger MU - 3/3 13:21:12
     RE: This needs to be repeated often: - MOCO SON MU - 3/3 11:37:15
     so does this - ashtray UF - 3/3 11:34:40
          You are wrong - BigDave MU - 3/3 13:39:05
          and when states violate their own laws in a federal - Spanky KU - 3/3 12:07:06
               No (nm) - pickle MU - 3/3 12:37:30
               the state supreme court said they didn't - ashtray UF - 3/3 12:17:34
                    and then what is the process? - Spanky KU - 3/3 12:19:57
                         the state supreme court is the end of the process (nm) - ashtray UF - 3/3 12:21:54
                              False. Try again(nm) - Spanky KU - 3/3 12:25:27
                                   State supreme court’s interpretation of any state law - ashtray UF - 3/3 12:27:32
                                        define 'generally'..... last I checked it didn't mean - Spanky KU - 3/3 12:32:56
                                             good laydown (nm) - ashtray UF - 3/3 12:44:55
                                                  You are the one who backtracked from "the state supreme - Spanky KU - 3/3 12:54:41
                                                       you struggle with basic comprehension whenever you're - ashtray UF - 3/3 12:57:04
                                                            So you think you were correct with this post: - Spanky KU - 3/3 13:40:45
                                                                 both of those were 100% correct - ashtray UF - 3/3 13:50:54
                                                                      Nope... the 2nd one was MOST correct, but the 1st was very - Spanky KU - 3/3 14:21:01
                                                                           incorrect (nm) - ashtray UF - 3/3 14:35:48
                                                                                See? You had a chance to show you aren't a dumb@$$ - Spanky KU - 3/3 14:56:19
                                                                                     RE: See? You had a chance to show you aren't a dumb@$$ - ashtray UF - 3/3 16:00:43
                                                                                          You sure are! - Spanky KU - 3/3 16:25:02
                                                                                               "I know you are but what am I?" (nm) - ashtray UF - 3/3 18:31:31
                         The Supreme Court deals with Federal laws(nm) - meatiger MU - 3/3 12:20:24
                              Nope. Try again(nm) - Spanky KU - 3/3 12:24:59
          Federal election laws are a state issue?(nm) - DHighlander NWMSU - 3/3 11:35:33
               RE: Federal election laws are a state issue?(nm) - ashtray UF - 3/3 11:39:37
               Some people aren't bright enough to realize that even - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 3/3 11:37:14
                    And you must bend the Constitution so much - meatiger MU - 3/3 11:39:13
                         don't touch the poop, meat (nm) - ashtray UF - 3/3 11:40:07
                              I am helping to give you material when - meatiger MU - 3/3 11:41:47
                                   Like he did yesterday? That's funny. You take his - DHighlander NWMSU - 3/3 11:44:22
                                        Sit back and soak it in - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 3/3 11:46:13
                                             this is your typical lay down (nm) - ashtray UF - 3/3 11:47:07
                                        I only pointed out you calling things unconstitutional - ashtray UF - 3/3 11:45:27
                                             You left out a very important word in my statement. I said - DHighlander NWMSU - 3/3 12:33:30
                                                  the SC judgments - meatiger MU - 3/3 13:13:06
                                                       And? What is it about the process that confuses you? - DHighlander NWMSU - 3/3 13:27:42
                                                  context is where you fail - ashtray UF - 3/3 12:46:16
                                        Your English was quite clear(nm) - meatiger MU - 3/3 11:44:58
                                             Yes, it was. Apparently you and a$$hat require an English to - DHighlander NWMSU - 3/3 12:36:15
                                                  now you're projecting again - ashtray UF - 3/3 12:46:56
                                                       He was also looking for COVID-18, 17, and - meatiger MU - 3/3 13:13:52
                                                       You keep repeating that thinking you are making a point. - DHighlander NWMSU - 3/3 13:11:33
                                                            no, I've simply proved that you're as retarded as your - ashtray UF - 3/3 13:29:30
                                                                 You keep avoiding the question. Does my claiming it is self - DHighlander NWMSU - 3/3 14:45:43
                                                                      no, but you claiming anything is suspect and should be - ashtray UF - 3/3 15:45:14




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard