Welcome Guest

Sign In | Register

In this case, I believe they voted on standing

Posted on: March 3, 2021 at 13:04:24 CT

meatiger MU

Posts:

133094

Member For:

26.44 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

0

So the case has no merit. Maybe this is him reaching out to ask for someone with standing to come forth.

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

This needs to be repeated often: - Spanky KU - 3/3 11:33:48

As a reminder of judicial activism and overreach, yes (nm) - pickle MU

- 3/3 12:36:49

in Supreme Court parliance, a minority opinion - Ace AU - 3/3 12:31:49

So what if he’s a minority?(nm) - El-ahrairah BAMA - 3/3 12:33:20

his is an opinion that has zero impact on the decision - Ace AU - 3/3 12:41:21

RE: This needs to be repeated often: - MUTGR MU - 3/3 12:29:29

Every election is stolen, every voter a fraud - El-ahrairah BAMA - 3/3 12:06:52

Serious question; how much of a role does the chief justice - hokie VT - 3/3 11:56:07

I believe each justice is assigned to a circuit - meatiger MU - 3/3 12:02:30

If thomas could have brought that to SCOTUS, seems like - hokie VT - 3/3 12:47:04

In this case, I believe they voted on standing - meatiger MU - 3/3 13:04:24

the fact you think you should be ****ed off at all - ashtray UF - 3/3 12:48:25

According to my limited research it takes 4 justices - GA Tiger MU - 3/3 12:01:09

this was about standing - meatiger MU - 3/3 12:03:18

What difference at this point does it make? - tigerfans3 MU - 3/3 11:41:25

Why is it the job of the Court to provide "clear rules"?(nm) - meatiger MU - 3/3 11:37:56

You can't make it up - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 3/3 11:39:03

The job of the Court is to judge - meatiger MU - 3/3 11:39:36

And where did Justice Thomas ever say they were to make - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 3/3 11:41:20

Justice Thomas literally said: "provide clear rules" (nm) - ummmm MU - 3/3 12:34:36

Yes, just as a plow operator provides clear parking lots - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 3/3 12:43:31

That is a bad analogy. - ummmm MU - 3/3 13:16:28

The rules are there - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 3/3 13:22:45

Bring clarity to them by making more rules, right? - ummmm MU - 3/3 13:42:31

Their job is to answer the question in light of the US - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 3/3 13:44:58

And in the process of answering those questions - ummmm MU - 3/3 14:03:19

And the language of his text - meatiger MU - 3/3 14:13:35

It is not the job of the Court to even provide clarity - meatiger MU - 3/3 13:25:55

Of course it is their job to provide Constitutional clarity - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 3/3 13:29:11

It is not. Read the constitution (nm) - pickle MU

- 3/3 14:07:33

RE: Of course it is their job to provide Constitutional clarity - meatiger MU - 3/3 13:31:22

That is the clarity they provide - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 3/3 13:33:30

there was no plaintiff with standing(nm) - meatiger MU - 3/3 13:37:58

One is a verb - meatiger MU - 3/3 12:59:52

I guess I should have read your post before typing basically - ummmm MU - 3/3 13:17:00

That is fine - meatiger MU - 3/3 13:22:58

When one has a decades long record and has been very - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 3/3 13:24:06

So a very consistent person mis-wrote?(nm) - meatiger MU - 3/3 13:26:26

No, he was quite clear, quite accurate and quite consistent(nm) - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 3/3 13:30:31

when liberal judges do that you call it judicial activism - ashtray UF - 3/3 12:47:46

RE: And where did Justice Thomas ever say they were to make - meatiger MU - 3/3 11:42:37

Providing clarity is not making rules - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 3/3 11:44:35

he did not say provide clarity - meatiger MU - 3/3 11:46:20

Yes, rules are in place - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 3/3 11:47:59

So why did he not use those words? - meatiger MU - 3/3 11:50:45

He did use those words - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 3/3 12:23:08

So now you are spinning his words. Lol(nm) - meatiger MU - 3/3 13:01:40

No, I am interpreting his statement in light of his entire - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 3/3 13:07:08

If he is anything like you - meatiger MU - 3/3 13:12:14

They do - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 3/3 13:15:16

yet in this case - meatiger MU - 3/3 13:21:12

RE: This needs to be repeated often: - MOCO SON MU - 3/3 11:37:15

so does this - ashtray UF - 3/3 11:34:40

You are wrong - BigDave MU - 3/3 13:39:05

and when states violate their own laws in a federal - Spanky KU - 3/3 12:07:06

No (nm) - pickle MU

- 3/3 12:37:30

the state supreme court said they didn't - ashtray UF - 3/3 12:17:34

and then what is the process? - Spanky KU - 3/3 12:19:57

the state supreme court is the end of the process (nm) - ashtray UF - 3/3 12:21:54

False. Try again(nm) - Spanky KU - 3/3 12:25:27

State supreme court’s interpretation of any state law - ashtray UF - 3/3 12:27:32

define 'generally'..... last I checked it didn't mean - Spanky KU - 3/3 12:32:56

good laydown (nm) - ashtray UF - 3/3 12:44:55

You are the one who backtracked from "the state supreme - Spanky KU - 3/3 12:54:41

you struggle with basic comprehension whenever you're - ashtray UF - 3/3 12:57:04

So you think you were correct with this post: - Spanky KU - 3/3 13:40:45

both of those were 100% correct - ashtray UF - 3/3 13:50:54

Nope... the 2nd one was MOST correct, but the 1st was very - Spanky KU - 3/3 14:21:01

incorrect (nm) - ashtray UF - 3/3 14:35:48

See? You had a chance to show you aren't a dumb@$$ - Spanky KU - 3/3 14:56:19

RE: See? You had a chance to show you aren't a dumb@$$ - ashtray UF - 3/3 16:00:43

You sure are! - Spanky KU - 3/3 16:25:02

"I know you are but what am I?" (nm) - ashtray UF - 3/3 18:31:31

The Supreme Court deals with Federal laws(nm) - meatiger MU - 3/3 12:20:24

Nope. Try again(nm) - Spanky KU - 3/3 12:24:59

Federal election laws are a state issue?(nm) - DHighlander NWMSU - 3/3 11:35:33

RE: Federal election laws are a state issue?(nm) - ashtray UF - 3/3 11:39:37

Some people aren't bright enough to realize that even - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 3/3 11:37:14

And you must bend the Constitution so much - meatiger MU - 3/3 11:39:13

don't touch the poop, meat (nm) - ashtray UF - 3/3 11:40:07

I am helping to give you material when - meatiger MU - 3/3 11:41:47

Like he did yesterday? That's funny. You take his - DHighlander NWMSU - 3/3 11:44:22

Sit back and soak it in - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 3/3 11:46:13

this is your typical lay down (nm) - ashtray UF - 3/3 11:47:07

I only pointed out you calling things unconstitutional - ashtray UF - 3/3 11:45:27

You left out a very important word in my statement. I said - DHighlander NWMSU - 3/3 12:33:30

the SC judgments - meatiger MU - 3/3 13:13:06

And? What is it about the process that confuses you? - DHighlander NWMSU - 3/3 13:27:42

context is where you fail - ashtray UF - 3/3 12:46:16

Your English was quite clear(nm) - meatiger MU - 3/3 11:44:58

Yes, it was. Apparently you and a$$hat require an English to - DHighlander NWMSU - 3/3 12:36:15

now you're projecting again - ashtray UF - 3/3 12:46:56

He was also looking for COVID-18, 17, and - meatiger MU - 3/3 13:13:52

You keep repeating that thinking you are making a point. - DHighlander NWMSU - 3/3 13:11:33

no, I've simply proved that you're as retarded as your - ashtray UF - 3/3 13:29:30

You keep avoiding the question. Does my claiming it is self - DHighlander NWMSU - 3/3 14:45:43

no, but you claiming anything is suspect and should be - ashtray UF - 3/3 15:45:14

©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy About Tigerboard