Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

you're projecting (nm)

Posted on: December 4, 2019 at 14:52:46 CT
ashtray UF
Posts:
111045
Member For:
21.97 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
(nm) means no message
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Turley - Ace AU - 12/4 13:55:58
     RE: Turley - scan MU - 12/4 14:03:35
          Because the senate is full of Trump sycophants? - MrBlueSky MU - 12/4 14:06:13
               There is an 80% chance the Senate acquits - Ace AU - 12/4 14:10:19
                    You are a funny little man. On the basis of what has been - DHighlander NWMSU - 12/4 14:19:51
                    there is 100% chance the senate acquits b/c Trump has - blake1771 MU - 12/4 14:19:40
                         lol. See what you wanna see!(nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 12/4 14:21:09
                              RE: lol. See what you wanna see!(nm) - scan MU - 12/4 14:21:48
                         “Committed no crime” - Ace AU - 12/4 14:20:48
                              the DoJ said it. not me. sorry about your luck. - blake1771 MU - 12/4 14:25:20
                                   the DoJ based that on federal statutes - ashtray UF - 12/4 14:26:13
                                        one of your dumber posts. - blake1771 MU - 12/4 14:32:40
                                             don't blame me for your own mistake - ashtray UF - 12/4 14:37:01
                                                  you're retort says a lot about you and nothing about me. - blake1771 MU - 12/4 14:46:55
                                                       you're projecting (nm) - ashtray UF - 12/4 14:52:46
               RE: Because the senate is full of Trump sycophants? - scan MU - 12/4 14:09:37
     Nap is absolutely right (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 12/4 13:57:59
          If that were true then why has Schiff not tried to get the - DHighlander NWMSU - 12/4 14:09:15
               co-equal - mgtiger MU - 12/4 15:06:15
               if they ACTUALLY start an impeachment then yes the - blake1771 MU - 12/4 14:21:00
               why not the courts? - Ace AU - 12/4 14:13:11
                    1) There is no time limit on an impeachment inquiry. - DHighlander NWMSU - 12/4 14:25:50
                         proven - mgtiger MU - 12/4 15:08:21
               You haven't been paying attention. - MrBlueSky MU - 12/4 14:12:39
                    One lower court judge. What is the current record of - DHighlander NWMSU - 12/4 14:28:12
                         It was upheld by an appeals court too (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 12/4 14:47:14
                    do you pine for the good ol days of Holder refusing a House - blake1771 MU - 12/4 14:24:06
                         He was found in contempt of Congress. Forgetting that? - MrBlueSky MU - 12/4 14:25:17
                              thanks for proving my point. by congress. not by a court. - blake1771 MU - 12/4 14:28:38
                              RE: He was found in contempt of Congress. Forgetting that? - scan MU - 12/4 14:27:49
               I think it's more so because Schiff and Pelosi want to get - ashtray UF - 12/4 14:11:53
                    RE: I think it's more so because Schiff and Pelosi want to get - scan MU - 12/4 14:12:42
                         possibly (nm) - ashtray UF - 12/4 14:13:26




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard