Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

1) There is no time limit on an impeachment inquiry.

Posted on: December 4, 2019 at 14:25:50 CT
DHighlander NWMSU
Posts:
47687
Member For:
16.08 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
2
2) Since when has cost factored into their witch hunt of Trump? That was stupid, even for you.

3) Not responding to absurd charges is hardly an admission that they are valid. That was also stupid, even for you.

Checks and balances are built into all three branches. If Schiff believes the executive is out of line then the judicial branch is the answer to that question. He does not get to decide himself. The fact that you chastised me is hilarious when it is you who has no understanding of checks and balances.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Turley - Ace A - 12/4 13:55:58
     RE: Turley - scan MU - 12/4 14:03:35
          Because the senate is full of Trump sycophants? - MrBlueSky MU - 12/4 14:06:13
               There is an 80% chance the Senate acquits - Ace A - 12/4 14:10:19
                    You are a funny little man. On the basis of what has been - DHighlander NWMSU - 12/4 14:19:51
                    there is 100% chance the senate acquits b/c Trump has - blake1771 MU - 12/4 14:19:40
                         lol. See what you wanna see!(nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 12/4 14:21:09
                              RE: lol. See what you wanna see!(nm) - scan MU - 12/4 14:21:48
                         “Committed no crime” - Ace A - 12/4 14:20:48
                              the DoJ said it. not me. sorry about your luck. - blake1771 MU - 12/4 14:25:20
                                   the DoJ based that on federal statutes - ashtray UF - 12/4 14:26:13
                                        one of your dumber posts. - blake1771 MU - 12/4 14:32:40
                                             don't blame me for your own mistake - ashtray UF - 12/4 14:37:01
                                                  you're retort says a lot about you and nothing about me. - blake1771 MU - 12/4 14:46:55
                                                       you're projecting (nm) - ashtray UF - 12/4 14:52:46
               RE: Because the senate is full of Trump sycophants? - scan MU - 12/4 14:09:37
     Nap is absolutely right (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 12/4 13:57:59
          If that were true then why has Schiff not tried to get the - DHighlander NWMSU - 12/4 14:09:15
               co-equal - mgtiger MU - 12/4 15:06:15
               if they ACTUALLY start an impeachment then yes the - blake1771 MU - 12/4 14:21:00
               why not the courts? - Ace A - 12/4 14:13:11
                    1) There is no time limit on an impeachment inquiry. - DHighlander NWMSU - 12/4 14:25:50
                         proven - mgtiger MU - 12/4 15:08:21
               You haven't been paying attention. - MrBlueSky MU - 12/4 14:12:39
                    One lower court judge. What is the current record of - DHighlander NWMSU - 12/4 14:28:12
                         It was upheld by an appeals court too (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 12/4 14:47:14
                    do you pine for the good ol days of Holder refusing a House - blake1771 MU - 12/4 14:24:06
                         He was found in contempt of Congress. Forgetting that? - MrBlueSky MU - 12/4 14:25:17
                              thanks for proving my point. by congress. not by a court. - blake1771 MU - 12/4 14:28:38
                              RE: He was found in contempt of Congress. Forgetting that? - scan MU - 12/4 14:27:49
               I think it's more so because Schiff and Pelosi want to get - ashtray UF - 12/4 14:11:53
                    RE: I think it's more so because Schiff and Pelosi want to get - scan MU - 12/4 14:12:42
                         possibly (nm) - ashtray UF - 12/4 14:13:26




©2024 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard