Welcome Guest

why not the courts?

Posted on: December 4, 2019 at 14:13:11 CT

Ace UNC

Posts:

28854

Member For:

5.90 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

(1) Time lost due to delay
(2) Costs
(3) Non-Responsiveness substantiates the Obstruction charge

Your last paragraph illustrates poor understanding of Checks & Balances and the Impeachment Clause

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

Turley - Ace AU - 12/4 13:55:58

RE: Turley - scan MU - 12/4 14:03:35

Because the senate is full of Trump sycophants? - MrBlueSky MU - 12/4 14:06:13

There is an 80% chance the Senate acquits - Ace AU - 12/4 14:10:19

You are a funny little man. On the basis of what has been - DHighlander NWMSU - 12/4 14:19:51

there is 100% chance the senate acquits b/c Trump has - blake1771 MU - 12/4 14:19:40

lol. See what you wanna see!(nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 12/4 14:21:09

RE: lol. See what you wanna see!(nm) - scan MU - 12/4 14:21:48

“Committed no crime” - Ace AU - 12/4 14:20:48

the DoJ said it. not me. sorry about your luck. - blake1771 MU - 12/4 14:25:20

the DoJ based that on federal statutes - ashtray UF - 12/4 14:26:13

one of your dumber posts. - blake1771 MU - 12/4 14:32:40

don't blame me for your own mistake - ashtray UF - 12/4 14:37:01

you're retort says a lot about you and nothing about me. - blake1771 MU - 12/4 14:46:55

you're projecting (nm) - ashtray UF - 12/4 14:52:46

RE: Because the senate is full of Trump sycophants? - scan MU - 12/4 14:09:37

Nap is absolutely right (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 12/4 13:57:59

If that were true then why has Schiff not tried to get the - DHighlander NWMSU - 12/4 14:09:15

co-equal - mgtiger MU - 12/4 15:06:15

if they ACTUALLY start an impeachment then yes the - blake1771 MU - 12/4 14:21:00

why not the courts? - Ace AU - 12/4 14:13:11

1) There is no time limit on an impeachment inquiry. - DHighlander NWMSU - 12/4 14:25:50

proven - mgtiger MU - 12/4 15:08:21

You haven't been paying attention. - MrBlueSky MU - 12/4 14:12:39

One lower court judge. What is the current record of - DHighlander NWMSU - 12/4 14:28:12

It was upheld by an appeals court too (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 12/4 14:47:14

do you pine for the good ol days of Holder refusing a House - blake1771 MU - 12/4 14:24:06

He was found in contempt of Congress. Forgetting that? - MrBlueSky MU - 12/4 14:25:17

thanks for proving my point. by congress. not by a court. - blake1771 MU - 12/4 14:28:38

RE: He was found in contempt of Congress. Forgetting that? - scan MU - 12/4 14:27:49

I think it's more so because Schiff and Pelosi want to get - ashtray UF - 12/4 14:11:53

RE: I think it's more so because Schiff and Pelosi want to get - scan MU - 12/4 14:12:42

possibly (nm) - ashtray UF - 12/4 14:13:26