Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

I think it's more so because Schiff and Pelosi want to get

Posted on: December 4, 2019 at 14:11:53 CT
ashtray UF
Posts:
111045
Member For:
22.50 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
the articles to the senate as soon as possible. They don't want to "drag this out", but it's more likely they want to try and push it through as fast as they can before people lose interest.
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Turley - Ace AU - 12/4 13:55:58
     RE: Turley - scan MU - 12/4 14:03:35
          Because the senate is full of Trump sycophants? - MrBlueSky MU - 12/4 14:06:13
               There is an 80% chance the Senate acquits - Ace AU - 12/4 14:10:19
                    You are a funny little man. On the basis of what has been - DHighlander NWMSU - 12/4 14:19:51
                    there is 100% chance the senate acquits b/c Trump has - blake1771 MU - 12/4 14:19:40
                         lol. See what you wanna see!(nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 12/4 14:21:09
                              RE: lol. See what you wanna see!(nm) - scan MU - 12/4 14:21:48
                         “Committed no crime” - Ace AU - 12/4 14:20:48
                              the DoJ said it. not me. sorry about your luck. - blake1771 MU - 12/4 14:25:20
                                   the DoJ based that on federal statutes - ashtray UF - 12/4 14:26:13
                                        one of your dumber posts. - blake1771 MU - 12/4 14:32:40
                                             don't blame me for your own mistake - ashtray UF - 12/4 14:37:01
                                                  you're retort says a lot about you and nothing about me. - blake1771 MU - 12/4 14:46:55
                                                       you're projecting (nm) - ashtray UF - 12/4 14:52:46
               RE: Because the senate is full of Trump sycophants? - scan MU - 12/4 14:09:37
     Nap is absolutely right (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 12/4 13:57:59
          If that were true then why has Schiff not tried to get the - DHighlander NWMSU - 12/4 14:09:15
               co-equal - mgtiger MU - 12/4 15:06:15
               if they ACTUALLY start an impeachment then yes the - blake1771 MU - 12/4 14:21:00
               why not the courts? - Ace AU - 12/4 14:13:11
                    1) There is no time limit on an impeachment inquiry. - DHighlander NWMSU - 12/4 14:25:50
                         proven - mgtiger MU - 12/4 15:08:21
               You haven't been paying attention. - MrBlueSky MU - 12/4 14:12:39
                    One lower court judge. What is the current record of - DHighlander NWMSU - 12/4 14:28:12
                         It was upheld by an appeals court too (nm) - MrBlueSky MU - 12/4 14:47:14
                    do you pine for the good ol days of Holder refusing a House - blake1771 MU - 12/4 14:24:06
                         He was found in contempt of Congress. Forgetting that? - MrBlueSky MU - 12/4 14:25:17
                              thanks for proving my point. by congress. not by a court. - blake1771 MU - 12/4 14:28:38
                              RE: He was found in contempt of Congress. Forgetting that? - scan MU - 12/4 14:27:49
               I think it's more so because Schiff and Pelosi want to get - ashtray UF - 12/4 14:11:53
                    RE: I think it's more so because Schiff and Pelosi want to get - scan MU - 12/4 14:12:42
                         possibly (nm) - ashtray UF - 12/4 14:13:26




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard