Welcome Guest
Sign In | Register

because the militia was not a standing army

Posted on: October 16, 2019 at 16:41:41 CT
pickle MU
Posts:
267340
Member For:
26.44 yrs
Level:
User
M.O.B. Votes:
0
and was composed of individuals, free people

Because a well-regulated militia is necessary to a free state, the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed

You really are stupid
Report Message

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

Handle:
Password:
Subject:

MESSAGE THREAD

Here's something I've always known and - GA Tiger MU - 10/16 15:57:11
     that ole Air Force historian sounds like a real pussy. - RayKinsella1922 SEC - 10/16 18:15:50
     Yes, that's exactly what they intended... - Gyro MU - 10/16 16:31:22
          it isn’t (nm) - pickle MU - 10/16 16:33:11
               conclusoryanswers.com(nm) - Gyro MU - 10/16 16:37:26
                    What was the structure of this militia? Who were the members - TigerMatt STL - 10/16 17:01:51
                         By in large - MrBlueSky MU - 10/16 17:11:48
                              Yes, slave patrols were often made of state militia members. - TigerMatt STL - 10/16 17:32:57
          RE: Yes, that's exactly what they intended... - MOCO SON MU - 10/16 16:32:08
               It's not as long as folks have good aim(nm) - Mormad MU - 10/16 16:33:00
                    RE: It's not as long as folks have good aim(nm) - MOCO SON MU - 10/16 16:34:19
                         I meant to make sure that you thin the pumpkin latte crowd(nm) - Mormad MU - 10/16 16:39:25
     given that there were likely few police back then - meatiger MU - 10/16 16:22:03
          Police departments were started because big companies - TigerMatt STL - 10/16 16:26:43
          There were certainly laws, and courts and atty's, basically - GA Tiger MU - 10/16 16:26:00
               Were the Indians fluent in American jurisprudence? (nm) - JeffB MU - 10/16 17:55:00
               you ignored the question - meatiger MU - 10/16 16:29:31
                    Yes, I doubt if I know the answer.(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 10/16 16:31:33
                         You do. It just conflicts with other beliefs you hold.(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 10/16 16:43:35
                              Lol - meatiger MU - 10/16 16:44:41
     RE: Here's something I've always known and - None**** MU - 10/16 16:16:48
          Maybe. I would need to see the writings on that.(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 10/16 16:19:38
               I already told you. Federalist 46.(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 10/16 16:20:20
                    Even so, the Federalist papers were essentially essays - Mormad MU - 10/16 16:30:59
                         The author of Federalist 46 wrote the 2nd Amendment.(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 10/16 16:35:08
                              I'm sure that he was very influential regarding the need - Mormad MU - 10/16 16:38:07
                         Very true. And its possible that a majority, at the - GA Tiger MU - 10/16 16:33:01
                              the revolution has absolutely nothing to do with this (nm) - pickle MU - 10/16 16:38:09
                              JFC.. the Constitution was a decade AFTER the war.(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 10/16 16:35:40
                    Ok. I did not see writing specifically saying that - GA Tiger MU - 10/16 16:24:23
                         WTF do you think this says? - TigerMatt STL - 10/16 16:37:00
                         goddamn (nm) - pickle MU - 10/16 16:31:55
                              He is profoundly stupid mixing the time period of the - TigerMatt STL - 10/16 16:38:29
                                   it’s a waste of time trying to explain anything to him (nm) - pickle MU - 10/16 16:40:08
                         Federalist 46 predates the Constitution. You are profoundly - TigerMatt STL - 10/16 16:28:44
                              I fail to see the significance of that. Virtually - GA Tiger MU - 10/16 16:30:16
                                   Because Madison wrote the 2nd Amendment and Federalist 46. - TigerMatt STL - 10/16 16:34:28
                                        Yes, they had that right. That doesn't mean - GA Tiger MU - 10/16 16:39:29
                                             If their wording was so precise why was that followed by - DHighlander NWMSU - 10/16 16:45:52
                                             because the militia was not a standing army - pickle MU - 10/16 16:41:41
                                             Who the hell do you think makes up the militia?(nm) - TigerMatt STL - 10/16 16:41:01
     the militia was to fight against a tyrannical guvmint which - TigerFan92 MU - 10/16 16:12:50
     An armed populace was also planned as a final check against - DHighlander NWMSU - 10/16 16:11:58
          It would truly be interesting to go back in time - Mormad MU - 10/16 16:19:33
               I can't believe they would believe that this was the - GA Tiger MU - 10/16 16:23:09
                    The only way to prevent what we have today - Mormad MU - 10/16 16:26:15
                         Actually our Constitution was and is just fine. But in the - DHighlander NWMSU - 10/16 16:37:49
                              Just the courts? - meatiger MU - 10/16 17:11:05
                                   The courts are the final arbiters of what is Constitutional. - DHighlander NWMSU - 10/16 17:15:14
                                        That is incorrect (nm) - pickle MU - 10/16 17:22:32
                              Its meaningless to the extent that the SC can - GA Tiger MU - 10/16 16:43:27
                                   they have always done so - pickle MU - 10/16 16:44:21
                         Thats a start. And one term. Which I guess would - GA Tiger MU - 10/16 16:29:21
          True, and one more indication of their wisdom. Few - GA Tiger MU - 10/16 16:18:45
     You really should read Federalist 46 by the same author as - TigerMatt STL - 10/16 16:05:26
          None of that has anything to do with what - GA Tiger MU - 10/16 16:10:25
               Dummy, the 2nd Amendment was written AFTER the US - TigerMatt STL - 10/16 16:19:25
                    Yes, but we had NOT thoroughly beaten England yet, - GA Tiger MU - 10/16 16:21:31
                         When was the US Constitution ratified? When did the - TigerMatt STL - 10/16 16:29:29
                              I, and I think they, considered England still - GA Tiger MU - 10/16 16:35:25
                              1787. 1783. Hmmmmm(nm) - meatiger MU - 10/16 16:31:10
                         No. Wrong again (nm) - pickle MU - 10/16 16:28:39
     Incorrect (nm) - pickle MU - 10/16 16:02:16
     RE: Here's something I've always known and - MOCO SON MU - 10/16 15:59:13
          Which are perfectly legal.(nm) - GA Tiger MU - 10/16 16:04:39




©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy   About Tigerboard