Welcome Guest

Sign In | Register

Nobody has said they're "ok" with that

Posted on: July 25, 2019 at 08:15:47 CT

MIZ45 MU

Posts:

40630

Member For:

16.68 yrs

Level:

User

M.O.B. Votes:

0

They just would like to form an opinion based on factual findings and/or evidence. And since he hasn't been indicted, impeached, or reprimanded in any way, why should it be believed at this point that he has obstructed anything? Which leads to another question - what justice has he supposedly obstructed?

Please explain why this message is being reported.

REPLY

MESSAGE THREAD

You all seem ok with Trump clearly obbstructing justice,why? - TexJohnson MU - 7/25 08:04:13

It's not even remotely clear. What are you smoking?(nm) - mizzouSECedes STL - 7/25 09:01:23

Give me one example that relates to a reality that isn't - GA Tiger MU - 7/25 08:46:19

Suppose you had testimony in an investigation - Mormad MU - 7/25 09:36:29

Why do you believe Trump needed help to fire Mueller? If he - DHighlander NWMSU - 7/25 08:38:05

What specifically did Trump do that’s classified... - JayRoy KC - 7/25 08:32:59

There it is, Folks!...One DOC handle having a conversation - DoltfromSTL MU - 7/25 08:36:04

You’re way off there Sherlock. Weak. - JayRoy KC - 7/25 09:02:18

why do you keep switching handles DOC?(nm) - NWMizzouFan MU

- 7/25 08:26:52

He uses one dumfuk handle to distract from another... - DoltfromSTL MU - 7/25 08:33:03

Well, Tex...It's like when you get one of them dotheads... - DoltfromSTL MU - 7/25 08:24:43

Lol(nm) - TheWildcat STL - 7/25 08:18:08

Nobody has said they're "ok" with that - MIZ45 MU - 7/25 08:15:47

By your rationale if Trump has a meeting - tman MU - 7/25 08:12:24

This isn't a hypothetical, he asked McGahn directly and - TexJohnson MU - 7/25 08:16:12

requires a corrupt intent. which was not present. - blake1771 KC - 7/25 09:24:39

He did not need either of them. If he wanted him fired he - DHighlander NWMSU - 7/25 08:42:04

A person who is accused unfairly should be pi$$ed off. - None**** MU - 7/25 08:23:28

And that isn't obstruction. What don't you get - tman MU - 7/25 08:18:40

which element? - Ace AU - 7/25 08:22:45

Your case falls apart in the second sentence. Obstruction - DHighlander NWMSU - 7/25 08:46:29

and furthermore requires a corrupt intent. - blake1771 KC - 7/25 09:25:57

RE: Your case falls apart in the second sentence. Obstruction - Ace AU - 7/25 09:20:12

Intent. He has the right to fire the FBI director for examp - tman MU - 7/25 08:27:27

RE: Intent. He has the right to fire the FBI director for examp - Ace AU - 7/25 08:32:20

You still aren't there. You are still confusing conversatio - tman MU - 7/25 08:44:50

False premise much? Try posting something factual - None**** MU - 7/25 08:11:09

Even Mueller didn't claim Trump clearly obstructed justice - mu7176grad MU - 7/25 08:09:31

RE: Even Mueller didn't claim Trump clearly obstructed justice - Ace AU - 7/25 08:10:21

Gee----"may have" not" clearly" - mu7176grad MU - 7/25 08:12:25

RE: Gee----"may have" not" clearly" - Ace AU - 7/25 08:16:14

You are making up the part about being indicted later - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/25 08:06:40

RE: You are making up the part about being indicted later - Ace AU - 7/25 08:08:46

Did you forget to switch handles DOC?(nm) - NWMizzouFan MU

- 7/25 08:29:20

I am using Mueller’s testimony and clarification - 4TigersinMichigan MU - 7/25 08:13:20

Dershowitz is 100Xs you intellectually - mu7176grad MU - 7/25 08:11:03

RE: Dershowitz is 100Xs you intellectually - Ace AU - 7/25 08:17:06

Factual statement---you are not close to Dershowitz - mu7176grad MU - 7/25 08:49:51

He didn't clearly obstruct justice. You're ignorance isn't - Ragnar Danneskjold MU

- 7/25 08:05:25

©2025 Fanboards L.L.C. — Our Privacy Policy About Tigerboard